[issue34490] transport.get_extra_info('sockname') of test_asyncio fails on AIX

Michael Felt added the comment: On 10/03/2019 19:37, Michael Felt wrote: > Michael Felt added the comment: > > Could this also be backported to Version 3.6? Ignore this since 3.6 is in security mode. > > -- > versions: +Python 3.6 > > ___ > Python

[issue34490] transport.get_extra_info('sockname') of test_asyncio fails on AIX

Michael Felt added the comment: Could this also be backported to Version 3.6? -- versions: +Python 3.6 ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue34490] transport.get_extra_info('sockname') of test_asyncio fails on AIX

Andrew Svetlov added the comment: New changeset d0491cd7fd8a22093ab1ae54eee51fb0e7805c0d by Andrew Svetlov in branch '3.7': [3.7] bpo-34490: Fix test_asyncio for AIX - do not call transport.get_extra_info('sockname') (GH-8907) (#9286)

[issue34490] transport.get_extra_info('sockname') of test_asyncio fails on AIX

Change by Andrew Svetlov : -- pull_requests: +8716 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue34490] transport.get_extra_info('sockname') of test_asyncio fails on AIX

Change by Andrew Svetlov : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed versions: -Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.6 ___ Python tracker

[issue34490] transport.get_extra_info('sockname') of test_asyncio fails on AIX

Michael Felt added the comment: Even if it is just in the spirit of issue29972 I hope this can be given a quick review and have yet one less test failing on the AIX bots. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue34490] transport.get_extra_info('sockname') of test_asyncio fails on AIX

Change by Michael Felt : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +8377 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue34490] transport.get_extra_info('sockname') of test_asyncio fails on AIX

Change by Michael Felt : -- keywords: +patch, patch pull_requests: +8377, 8378 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue34490] transport.get_extra_info('sockname') of test_asyncio fails on AIX

New submission from Michael Felt : Inspired by msg211764, issue20682 In short: For address family of AF_UNIX or AF_UNIX_CCSID, getsockname() returns 0 if issued before a bind(). The address length is 0. This is always the case for sockets created by socketpair(). That is at least one