Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
>which commits are you comparing exactly? From your explanation, I guess
>aacc77fbd and its parent, but that's not completely fair since PEP 590
>consists of many commits (see #36974). A better comparison would be master
>against 3.8a4.
I am
Jeroen Demeyer added the comment:
Could you please specify:
- which commits are you comparing exactly? From your explanation, I guess
aacc77fbd and its parent, but that's not completely fair since PEP 590 consists
of many commits (see #36974). A better comparison would be master against
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
Updated stack for the tip of 3.8:
* frame #0: 0x00010015854e
python.exe`unicode_length(self=0x0001014a4040) at unicodeobject.c:12235:9
frame #1: 0x0001a913 python.exe`PyObject_Size(o=0x0001014a4040)
at abstract.c:57:26
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
This is the stack difference for my previous experiment:
* frame #0: 0x0001001578ee
python.exe`unicode_length(self=0x00010140d220) at unicodeobject.c:12231:9
frame #1: 0x0001b453 python.exe`PyObject_Size(o=0x00010140d220)
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment:
I have bisected again and I always get commit
aacc77fbd77640a8f03638216fa09372cc21673d but it would be great if someone can
confirm these results independently.
--
___
Python tracker
New submission from Pablo Galindo Salgado :
Many functions are significantly slower after commit
aacc77fbd77640a8f03638216fa09372cc21673d was applied:
aacc77fbd77640a8f03638216fa09372cc21673d is the first bad commit
commit aacc77fbd77640a8f03638216fa09372cc21673d
Author: Jeroen Demeyer
Date:
