[issue38279] multiprocessing example enhancement

2019-11-02 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: I rejected the accompanying PR and the changes it proposed, therefore it seems reasonable to close this issue as well. -- nosy: +pitrou resolution: -> rejected stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed

[issue38279] multiprocessing example enhancement

2019-09-27 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Change by Terry J. Reedy : -- versions: +Python 3.8, Python 3.9 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue38279] multiprocessing example enhancement

2019-09-25 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Change by Raymond Hettinger : -- nosy: +davin ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue38279] multiprocessing example enhancement

2019-09-25 Thread Max
Change by Max : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +15979 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/16398 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue38279] multiprocessing example enhancement

2019-09-25 Thread Max Voss
New submission from Max Voss : Hello all, I've been trying to understand multiprocessing for a while, I tried multiple times. The PR is a suggested enhancement to the example that made it "click" for me. Or should I say, produced a working result that made sense to me. Details for each