[issue38818] Modify PyInterpreterState.eval_frame to pass tstate (PyThreadState)

Change by STINNER Victor : -- pull_requests: +18260 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17340 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue38818] Modify PyInterpreterState.eval_frame to pass tstate (PyThreadState)

STINNER Victor added the comment: I mark this issue as a duplicate of bpo-38500. -- resolution: -> duplicate stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed superseder: -> Provide a way to get/set PyInterpreterState.frame_eval without needing to access interpreter internals

[issue38818] Modify PyInterpreterState.eval_frame to pass tstate (PyThreadState)

Change by STINNER Victor : -- pull_requests: +16837 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17352 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue38818] Modify PyInterpreterState.eval_frame to pass tstate (PyThreadState)

Brett Cannon added the comment: I think bpo-38500 needs to get resolved first before this as that will affect whether this is acceptable or not as an API-breaking change. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue38818] Modify PyInterpreterState.eval_frame to pass tstate (PyThreadState)

Change by STINNER Victor : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +16694 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17187 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue38818] Modify PyInterpreterState.eval_frame to pass tstate (PyThreadState)

New submission from STINNER Victor : Follow-up of bpo-36710 and bpo-38644: I would like to pass explicitly tstate (PyThreadState) to internal C functions. The problem is that PyInterpreterState.eval_frame function has no tstate parameter. I propose attached PR to add a tstate parameter. It's