[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Change by Terry J. Reedy : -- nosy: -terry.reedy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Dima Tisnek added the comment: Would now, a year later, be a good time to consider io_uring? -- nosy: +Dima.Tisnek ___ Python tracker ___

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Ronald Oussoren added the comment: I'm closing this as "later" as the consensus is that this might be a useful binding to have, but io_uring is evolving too fast at the moment. It is better to develop these bindings on PyPI, which also makes it easier to iterate on the design. --

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: I think that the answer is maybe, eventually, and if so, an ioring module that any event framework can use and a separate asyncio module for its use with asyncio. I say maybe because the lwn article suggests that additions and revisions might continue for

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Change by Giampaolo Rodola' : -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Change by Dong-hee Na : -- nosy: +corona10 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Ammar Askar added the comment: See also: https://github.com/python-trio/trio/issues/932 which contains a link to a library with cffi bindings to io_uring -- nosy: +ammar2 ___ Python tracker

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Cooper Lees added the comment: Totally agree with a separate module first to POC. I should have stated that. Main goal was to open this issue to start discussions :) -- ___ Python tracker

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Benjamin Peterson added the comment: I agree that adding stdlib support is premature. io_uring has a large and growing API surface. It will take some experimentation to see what the best way to expose its power to Python is. -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

Ronald Oussoren added the comment: How stable is the io_uring API? The stdlib evolves slowly, I'm not sure if the io_uring interface has matured enough to make it acceptable that updates to the stdlib bindings for that API are only done in new major releases of CPython (about every 18

[issue41271] Add support for io_uring to cpython

New submission from Cooper Lees : Would adding support for io_uring in Linux to stadlib IO and/or asyncio make sense? More info on io_uring: - https://kernel.dk/io_uring.pdf - https://lwn.net/Articles/810414/ -- components: IO messages: 373477 nosy: cooperlees priority: normal