[issue41870] Use PEP 590 vectorcall to speed up calls to bool()

Dong-hee Na added the comment: New changeset efccff9ac84009ef48e8cb22548ce80940f76533 by Dong-hee Na in branch 'master': bpo-41870: Update What's News 3.10 about vectorcall (#25219) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/efccff9ac84009ef48e8cb22548ce80940f76533 --

[issue41870] Use PEP 590 vectorcall to speed up calls to bool()

Change by Dong-hee Na : -- pull_requests: +23958 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25219 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue41870] Use PEP 590 vectorcall to speed up calls to bool()

Dong-hee Na added the comment: For the record, following built-in functions now support vectorcall calling convention from Python 3.10!! Thank you to everyone who works with this :) - map: bpo-43575 - filter: bpo-43287 - reversed: bpo-41922 - bool: bpo-41870 - float: bpo-41873 --

[issue41870] Use PEP 590 vectorcall to speed up calls to bool()

Dong-hee Na added the comment: Now the suggestion is applied! Thank you Pablo and Victor!!! -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue41870] Use PEP 590 vectorcall to speed up calls to bool()

Dong-hee Na added the comment: New changeset fa7ce080175f65d678a7d5756c94f82887fc9803 by Dong-hee Na in branch 'master': bpo-41870: Avoid the test when nargs=0 (GH-22462) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/fa7ce080175f65d678a7d5756c94f82887fc9803 --

[issue41870] Use PEP 590 vectorcall to speed up calls to bool()

Change by Dong-hee Na : -- pull_requests: +21488 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22462 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue41870] Use PEP 590 vectorcall to speed up calls to bool()

Change by Dong-hee Na : -- pull_requests: -21486 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue41870] Use PEP 590 vectorcall to speed up calls to bool()

Change by Dong-hee Na : -- pull_requests: +21486 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22460 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue41870] Use PEP 590 vectorcall to speed up calls to bool()

Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: > You can put ok<0 test in the if (nargs) branch, to avoid the test when > nargs=0. +1 -- nosy: +pablogsal ___ Python tracker ___

[issue41870] Use PEP 590 vectorcall to speed up calls to bool()

STINNER Victor added the comment: You can put ok<0 test in the if (nargs) branch, to avoid the test when nargs=0. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue41870] Use PEP 590 vectorcall to speed up calls to bool()

Dong-hee Na added the comment: Now I close this issue. Thank you, Mark! -- nosy: +Mark.Shannon ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue41870] Use PEP 590 vectorcall to speed up calls to bool()

Dong-hee Na added the comment: New changeset a195bceff7b552c5f86dec7894ff24dcc87235da by Dong-hee Na in branch 'master': bpo-41870: Use PEP 590 vectorcall to speed up bool() (GH-22427) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/a195bceff7b552c5f86dec7894ff24dcc87235da --

[issue41870] Use PEP 590 vectorcall to speed up calls to bool()

Change by Dong-hee Na : -- components: +Interpreter Core ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue41870] Use PEP 590 vectorcall to speed up calls to bool()

Change by Dong-hee Na : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +21461 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22427 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue41870] Use PEP 590 vectorcall to speed up calls to bool()

New submission from Dong-hee Na : bool type is well-used builtin types, I noticed that if we use vector call to bool type, it shows the awesome performance enhancement. Mean +- std dev: [master] 91.4 us +- 3.3 us -> [vectorcall] 48.6 us +- 3.1 us: 1.88x faster (-47%) -- assignee: