[issue42496] Don't change indentation of RST markup

2020-11-29 Thread Andrés Delfino
Andrés Delfino added the comment: When I open a PR fixing mark-up it's because it has visual effects. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue42496] Don't change indentation of RST markup

2020-11-29 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl added the comment: To be clear, this has nothing to do with the amount of indentation, but that the directive below (the versionadded) has 4 spaces, and the paragraph above had 5 before the change. Therefore the further-indented paragraph is taken as a blockquote. --

[issue42496] Don't change indentation of RST markup

2020-11-29 Thread Mark Dickinson
Change by Mark Dickinson : -- nosy: +mark.dickinson ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue42496] Don't change indentation of RST markup

2020-11-29 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Thanks for checking. -- resolution: -> not a bug stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue42496] Don't change indentation of RST markup

2020-11-28 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Original PR: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23524 I just checked, it has a visual effect for readers. For example: """ BUILD_STRING(count) Concatenates count strings from the stack and pushes the resulting string onto the stack. New in

[issue42496] Don't change indentation of RST markup

2020-11-28 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: If this does have a visual effect for readers or if it breaks strict Sphinx requirement, let me know. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue42496] Don't change indentation of RST markup

2020-11-28 Thread Raymond Hettinger
New submission from Raymond Hettinger : I just noticed that this PR was applied: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23545 In general, I don't think this should be done. AFAICT, it has no visual effect for the reader and that the current markup is allowed by Sphinx (i.e. this isn't a