[issue46108] Enum repr() incorrect when mixed with non-__new__ data types

Ethan Furman added the comment: Fixed in 3.11. -- resolution: -> fixed stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed superseder: -> Enum: modify __repr__, __str__; update docs type: -> behavior ___ Python tracker

[issue46108] Enum repr() incorrect when mixed with non-__new__ data types

Ethan Furman added the comment: Thanks, test added. I also updated the title. Code updated to treat any __repr__s as affecting the display of the member value instead of the member itself (i.e. the "<...: %r>" portion). if a user actually wants to change the member repr they can assign it