[issue46730] Please consider mentioning property without setter when an attribute can't be set

Change by Dennis Sweeney : -- pull_requests: +29562 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31427 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue46730] Please consider mentioning property without setter when an attribute can't be set

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: The test introduces a deprecation warning. It might be fixed by using raw string like the msg_format used in other test. ./python -Wall -m py_compile Lib/test/test_property.py Lib/test/test_property.py:345: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape

[issue46730] Please consider mentioning property without setter when an attribute can't be set

Dennis Sweeney added the comment: New changeset 9e06d03672547041239812efe4901c06da6cbd2f by Christian Heimes in branch 'main': bpo-46730: Fix refleak and tighten NULL checks (GH-31389) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/9e06d03672547041239812efe4901c06da6cbd2f --

[issue46730] Please consider mentioning property without setter when an attribute can't be set

Change by Christian Heimes : -- nosy: +christian.heimes nosy_count: 4.0 -> 5.0 pull_requests: +29534 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31389 ___ Python tracker

[issue46730] Please consider mentioning property without setter when an attribute can't be set

Dennis Sweeney added the comment: Thanks for the PR! -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue46730] Please consider mentioning property without setter when an attribute can't be set

[issue46730] Please consider mentioning property without setter when an attribute can't be set

Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan : -- nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue46730] Please consider mentioning property without setter when an attribute can't be set

Alexander added the comment: Added the PR. (I have signed the CLA, just haven't got the response yet, doesn't affect the discussion I guess) -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue46730] Please consider mentioning property without setter when an attribute can't be set

Change by Alexander : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +29472 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31311 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue46730] Please consider mentioning property without setter when an attribute can't be set

Dennis Sweeney added the comment: Go ahead and open a PR -- it makes it easier to discuss particular changes. Regarding backwards-compatibility, error messages improvements are fair game for Python 3.11, we just shouldn't backport them to earlier versions. We can also consider including the

[issue46730] Please consider mentioning property without setter when an attribute can't be set

Neil Girdhar added the comment: Thank you, this would have saved me a lot of time! On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 8:37 PM Alexander wrote: > > Alexander added the comment: > > Indeed, the error message does not help to identify the problem. Moreover, > it collides with similar errors in

[issue46730] Please consider mentioning property without setter when an attribute can't be set

Alexander added the comment: Indeed, the error message does not help to identify the problem. Moreover, it collides with similar errors in namedtuple and DynamicClassAttribute which may lead to even more confusion. I made a draft patch that could help with it

[issue46730] Please consider mentioning property without setter when an attribute can't be set

New submission from Neil Girdhar : class C: @property def f(self) -> int: return 2 class D(C): pass D().f = 2 Gives: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/neil/src/cmm/a.py", line 10, in D().f = 2 AttributeError: can't set attribute 'f' This can be a