[issue39450] unittest TestCase shortDescription does not strip whitespace

Chris Withers added the comment: New changeset 7561e7a83f5118fda6c62fe9c8c3458f8cfd by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.7': bpo-39450 Stripped whitespace before parsing the docstring in TestCase.shortDescription (GH-18321)

[issue39450] unittest TestCase shortDescription does not strip whitespace

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +17694 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18321 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39450] unittest TestCase shortDescription does not strip whitespace

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +17695 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18322 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39450] unittest TestCase shortDescription does not strip whitespace

Chris Withers added the comment: New changeset 032de7324e30c6b44ef272cea3be205a3d768759 by Steve Cirelli in branch 'master': bpo-39450 Stripped whitespace before parsing the docstring in TestCase.shortDescription (GH-18175)

[issue37224] test__xxsubinterpreters fails randomly

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +17693 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18318 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39533] Use `statx(2)` system call on Linux for extended `os.stat` information

New submission from ntninja : Background: For a long time several Linux filesystems have been tracking two extra bits of information. The file attributes bits[1] and the file creation time (aka crtime aka btime aka birthtime)[2]. Before Linux 4.11 accessing these required secret knowledge

[issue39515] pathlib won't strip "\n" in path

徐彻 added the comment: Thank you for your explanation. -- resolution: -> not a bug stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39479] [RFE] Add math.lcm() function: Least Common Multiple

Tim Peters added the comment: [Tim] >> The pure-Python Miller-Rabin code i posted in the >> aforementioned thread is typically at least 100 >> times faster than that. [Steven] > This is exactly the sort of argument about quality of > implementation which isn't, or shouldn't be, part of > the

[issue39479] [RFE] Add math.lcm() function: Least Common Multiple

Steven D'Aprano added the comment: > [Steven] > > ... Try it on numbers like this: > > ... > > Q = P*(313*(P-1)+1)*(353*(P-1)+1) > > > > Q is a 397 digit Carmichael Number. Its smallest factor is P, > > which has 131 digits. [Tim] > The pure-Python Miller-Rabin code i posted in the

[issue39532] Pathlib: handling of `.` in paths and patterns creates unmatchable paths

Isaac Muse added the comment: The more I think about this, I think the normalization of paths is actually fine, it is the normalization of the patterns that is problematic, or more the difference in normalization. I could live with the pattern normalization of `.` and trailing `/` if it was

[issue39349] Add "cancel_futures" parameter to concurrent.futures.Executor.shutdown()

Kyle Stanley added the comment: > Thank you very muck, Kyle! No problem. Thanks for reviewing and merging the PR, Antoine! -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39532] Pathlib: handling of `.` in paths and patterns creates unmatchable paths

New submission from Isaac Muse : It appears that the pathlib library strips out `.` in glob paths when they represent a directory. This is kind of a naive approach in my opinion, but I understand what was trying to be achieved. When a path is given to pathlib, it normalizes it by stripping

[issue39511] [subinterpreters] Per-interpreter singletons (None, True, False, etc.)

Jeremy Kloth added the comment: +1, obviously, as I came to the same conclusion above (see msg361122) -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39511] [subinterpreters] Per-interpreter singletons (None, True, False, etc.)

Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Random idea (not carefully thought-out): Would it be simpler to have these objects just ignore their refcount by having dealloc() be a null operation or having it set the refcount back to a positive number). That would let sub-interpreters share the

[issue39511] [subinterpreters] Per-interpreter singletons (None, True, False, etc.)

Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Is the sub-interpreter PEP approved? If not, I had thought the plan was to only implement PRs that made clean-ups that would have been necessary anyway. -- nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker

[issue39492] reference cycle affecting Pickler instances (Python3.8+)

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: New changeset 17236873392533ce0c5d7bbf52cbd61bca171c59 by Antoine Pitrou in branch '3.8': [3.8] bpo-39492: Fix a reference cycle between reducer_override and a Pickler instance (GH-18266) (#18316)

[issue39492] reference cycle affecting Pickler instances (Python3.8+)

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Thank you for the PR! -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39492] reference cycle affecting Pickler instances (Python3.8+)

Change by Antoine Pitrou : -- pull_requests: +17692 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18316 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39531] Memory Leak in multiprocessing.Pool()

New submission from EMO : After even deleting all variables it still reserves memory of around a GB. -- components: Library (Lib) files: User's.py messages: 361253 nosy: EMO priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Memory Leak in multiprocessing.Pool() type: behavior

[issue39492] reference cycle affecting Pickler instances (Python3.8+)

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 0f2f35e15f9fbee44ce042b724348419d8136bc5 by Pierre Glaser in branch 'master': bpo-39492: Fix a reference cycle between reducer_override and a Pickler instance (GH-18266)

[issue39479] [RFE] Add math.lcm() function: Least Common Multiple

Tim Peters added the comment: [Steven] > ... Try it on numbers like this: > ... > Q = P*(313*(P-1)+1)*(353*(P-1)+1) > > Q is a 397 digit Carmichael Number. Its smallest factor is P, > which has 131 digits. > ... > My old and slow PC can prove that Q is a composite number, > using pure Python,

[issue35885] configparser: indentation

SilentGhost added the comment: I would suggest adding indent parameter to the write method, it would default to an empty string and could be used directly in the formatting operation. -- nosy: +SilentGhost ___ Python tracker

[issue39529] Deprecate get_event_loop()

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Yes, it is what I meant. Many code written before 3.7 use get_event_loop() because there was no get_running_loop() yet. Now, to avoid deprecation (and making the code more robust) it should be rewritten with using get_running_loop() or get_event_loop()

[issue39529] Deprecate get_event_loop()

Change by Andrew Svetlov : -- components: +asyncio nosy: +yselivanov ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue39529] Deprecate get_event_loop()

Andrew Svetlov added the comment: Serhiy, maybe I had not understood your proposal properly. If you are asking about deprecating get_event_loop() call from outside of async code but implicit call get_running_loop() without a warning if called from async function -- it sounds like a

[issue39529] Deprecate get_event_loop()

Andrew Svetlov added the comment: Currently, I'm talking about adding a deprecation only. The asyncio.get_event_loop() function will stay in Python for a while in deprecated status. I don't know the exact period but it should be 3 releases at least I guess, with possibly extending to 5

[issue39524] Escape sequences in doc string of ast._pad_whitespace

Eric V. Smith added the comment: I think this would be an improvement, and an good issue for a newcomer. I'd vote for the r-string, but it doesn't really matter. -- keywords: +easy, newcomer friendly nosy: +eric.smith stage: -> needs patch ___

[issue39529] Deprecate get_event_loop()

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Will asyncio.get_event_loop() be removed or made an alias of asyncio.get_running_loop()? The latter could minimize the disruption of the existing code. -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker

[issue35885] configparser: indentation

Ido Michael added the comment: Can I take this? What needs to be done? adding an indent flag and if it's passed indent the keys? -- nosy: +Ido Michael ___ Python tracker ___

[issue38101] Update devguide triaging keywords

Ido Michael added the comment: It treats the PR as a cpython while it's on the devguide repo, here is the link: https://github.com/python/devguide/pull/570 -- ___ Python tracker

[issue38101] Update devguide triaging keywords

Ido Michael added the comment: Added a PR: GH-570 -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue39128] Document happy eyeball parameters in loop.create_connection signature docs

Ido Michael added the comment: Created PR added arguments to method signature in doc. GH-18315 -- nosy: +Ido Michael ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39128] Document happy eyeball parameters in loop.create_connection signature docs

Change by Ido Michael : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +17691 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18315 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue10572] Move test sub-packages to Lib/test

Ido Michael added the comment: Are there any conclusions? what needs to be done? -- nosy: +Ido Michael ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue38691] [easy] importlib: PYTHONCASEOK should be ignored when using python3 -E

Ido Michael added the comment: Created this PR: GH-18314 -- nosy: +Ido Michael ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue38691] [easy] importlib: PYTHONCASEOK should be ignored when using python3 -E

Change by Ido Michael : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +17690 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18314 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39274] Conversion from fractions.Fraction to bool

SilentGhost added the comment: "Successful" PR would be merged into master. This issue is still in "patch review" stage. -- nosy: +SilentGhost ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39274] Conversion from fractions.Fraction to bool

Ido Michael added the comment: Hi all, I think this issue can be closed right? Saw a successful PR. -- nosy: +Ido Michael ___ Python tracker ___

[issue37404] asyncio sock_recv blocks on ssl sockets.

Ido Michael added the comment: Sorry it broke the version, what could I have done to avoid this? Also can we close this issue? -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39530] Documentation about comparisons between numeric types is misleading

Mark Dickinson added the comment: Related SO question: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60005876/how-does-python-compare-int-to-float-objects -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39530] Documentation about comparisons between numeric types is misleading

New submission from Mark Dickinson : The documentation[1] for comparisons between mixed types says: > [...] when a binary arithmetic operator has operands of different > numeric types, the operand with the "narrower" type is widened to > that of the other, where integer is narrower than

[issue39434] Remove unnecessary logic of float __floordiv__

Dong-hee Na added the comment: Thanks good catch :) -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue28312] Minor change - more direct hint re: multiple machine sizes and LONG_BIT conflicts

Change by Michael Felt : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +17689 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18313 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39349] Add "cancel_futures" parameter to concurrent.futures.Executor.shutdown()

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: New changeset 339fd46cb764277cbbdc3e78dcc5b45b156bb6ae by Kyle Stanley in branch 'master': bpo-39349: Add *cancel_futures* to Executor.shutdown() (GH-18057) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/339fd46cb764277cbbdc3e78dcc5b45b156bb6ae --

[issue39349] Add "cancel_futures" parameter to concurrent.futures.Executor.shutdown()

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Thank you very muck, Kyle! -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue28276] test_loading.py - false positive result for "def test_find" when find_library() is not functional or the (shared) library does not exist

Change by Michael Felt : -- versions: +Python 3.8, Python 3.9 -Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue28276] test_loading.py - false positive result for "def test_find" when find_library() is not functional or the (shared) library does not exist

Change by Michael Felt : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +17688 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18312 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39434] Remove unnecessary logic of float __floordiv__

Mark Dickinson added the comment: @shihai1991 Good catch! Now fixed. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue39434] Remove unnecessary logic of float __floordiv__

Change by Mark Dickinson : -- pull_requests: +17687 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18311 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39529] Deprecate get_event_loop()

New submission from Andrew Svetlov : Yuri proposed it for Python 3.8 but at that time the change was premature. Now we can reconsider it for 3.9 The problem is that asyncio.get_event_loop() not only returns a loop but also creates it on-demand if the thread is main and the loop doesn't exist.

[issue28276] test_loading.py - false positive result for "def test_find" when find_library() is not functional or the (shared) library does not exist

Michael Felt added the comment: This is something from long long ago - time to get it completed. The (remaining) issue is: "c" and "m" may not be shared libraries - so nothing is ever found and the test is "skipped" but reports itself as PASSED. The original issue (fixed for AIX in

[issue39483] Proposial add loop parametr to run in asyncio

Change by Andrew Svetlov : -- resolution: -> wont fix status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue39434] Remove unnecessary logic of float __floordiv__

hai shi added the comment: Small style question: using 5 spaces in https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Objects/floatobject.c#L655-L664 after PR 18147 merged. Due to bpo don't receive style quesiton, I commented here. -- nosy: +shihai1991

[issue12915] Add inspect.locate and inspect.resolve

Change by Vinay Sajip : -- pull_requests: +17686 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18310 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39526] print(text1.get(1.2,1.5))

Change by SilentGhost : -- resolution: -> not a bug stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue39526] print(text1.get(1.2,1.5))

mlwtc added the comment: ok, I see, Thank U. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue39350] Remove deprecated fractions.gcd()

Mark Dickinson added the comment: Apologies, I think I moved the discussion off-track. The first order of business should be to fix the regression. We can discuss behaviour changes after that. I've opened GH-18309 as a quick fix for the regression. --

[issue39350] Remove deprecated fractions.gcd()

Change by Mark Dickinson : -- pull_requests: +17685 stage: resolved -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18309 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39513] NameError: name 'open' is not defined

Vinay Sajip added the comment: Well, my comment/request was prompted by whether this issue is a duplicate of bpo-26789, because it's not clear from the OP. If it is, then it can be closed as such. I don't think this is specifically a logging problem, more a case of how things become

[issue39526] print(text1.get(1.2,1.5))

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: 1.30 is the same as 1.3 in Python. You perhaps want to use '1.30'. -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker ___