Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
assignee: -> barry
versions: +Python 3.8
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
Can we also cover Brew?
Here's the dumb little configure wrapper I use:
```
#!/bin/sh
export CPPFLAGS="-I$(brew --prefix sqlite3)/include -I$(brew --prefix
zlib)/include"
export LDFLAGS="-L$(brew --prefix sqlite3)/
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
We can't remove the code because it might still be used by third parties.
Deprecation generally means we inform users that they shouldn't use the code
any more (possibly with a DeprecationWarning, although we decided not
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
nosy: +barry
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32699>
___
__
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
nosy: +barry
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32694>
___
__
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
Hi Jay. Thanks for your interest in contributing to Python!
Actually, I'm going to close this issue since we ultimately decided to
deprecate the ResourceLoader ABC:
https://docs.python.org/3.7/library/importlib.html?hig
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
nosy: +barry
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32493>
___
__
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
Now that the zipimporter support has landed, I think we're done!
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
type: -> enhancement
___
P
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
New changeset 6f6eb35f9bee18f54945f09664344f2d118ed89f by Barry Warsaw in
branch 'master':
bpo-32248 - Implement `ResourceReader` and `get_resource_reader()` for
zipimport (#5248)
https://github.com/python/cpython/
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
versions: +Python 3.6
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bu
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
New changeset 196b8cbab2b5044b92077f0b3c07c798fff68bc6 by Barry Warsaw (Miss
Islington (bot)) in branch '3.6':
bpo-32651 Recommend getpass.getuser() (GH-5301) (#5304)
https://github.com/python/cpython/
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
New changeset d499031f5f33c3ef71be7c81ef52eee6b47c42e1 by Barry Warsaw in
branch 'master':
bpo-32651 Recommend getpass.getuser() (#5301)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d499031f5f33c3ef71be7c81ef52eee6b4
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5148
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
New submission from Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
The documentation for os.getlogin() says:
"Return the name of the user logged in on the controlling terminal of the
process. For most purposes, it is more useful to use the environment variables
LOGNAME or USERNAME to f
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
versions: +Python 3.7
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bu
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
New changeset d69794f4df81de731cc66dc82136e28bee691e1e by Barry Warsaw (Bo
Bayles) in branch '3.6':
[3.6] bpo-32502: Discard 64-bit (and other invalid) hardware addresses
(GH-5254) (#5290)
https://github.com/python/cpython/
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
New changeset 6b273f7f4056f8276f61a97c789d6bb4425e653c by Barry Warsaw (Bo
Bayles) in branch 'master':
bpo-32502: Discard 64-bit (and other invalid) hardware addresses (#5254)
https://github.com/python/cpython/
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
Has anyone done the same analysis with Python 3.6 or 3.7?
--
nosy: +barry
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
pull_requests: +5093
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32248>
___
_
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
pull_requests: -5016
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32248>
___
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Jan 15, 2018, at 11:31, Brett Cannon <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> 1. SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH acts as an environment variable flag to forcibly
> generate hash-based .pyc files with the check_source bit set in py_comp
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
nosy: +barry
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32516>
___
__
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
pull_requests: -5006
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32248>
___
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
@bbayles: I don't think PR 5149 is related to this issue.
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
I'm closing this as won't fix since smtpd.py is deprecated and will likely not
get any future development. Please see aiosmtpd as a much better third party
replacement.
--
resolution: -> wont fix
stage: test needed -&
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
I'm closing this as won't fix since smtpd.py is deprecated and will likely not
get any future development. Please see aiosmtpd as a much better third party
replacement.
--
resolution: -> wont fix
stage: -> resolved
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
I'm closing this as won't fix since smtpd.py is deprecated and will likely not
get any future development. Please see aiosmtpd as a much better third party
replacement.
--
nosy: +barry
resolution: -> wont fix
stage: ne
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
I'm closing this as won't fix since smtpd.py is deprecated and will likely not
get any future development. Please see aiosmtpd as a much better third party
replacement.
--
nosy: +barry
resolution: -> wont fix
stage: te
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
I'm closing this as won't fix since smtpd.py is deprecated and will likely not
get any future development. Please see aiosmtpd as a much better third party
replacement.
--
resolution: -> wont fix
stage: test needed -&
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
I'm closing this as won't fix since smtpd.py is deprecated and will likely not
get any future development. Please see aiosmtpd as a much better third party
replacement.
--
nosy: +barry
resolution: -> wont fix
stage: pat
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
I'm closing this as won't fix since smtpd.py is deprecated and will likely not
get any future development. Please see aiosmtpd as a much better third party
replacement.
--
nosy: +barry
resolution: -> wont fix
stage: -&
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
I'm closing this as won't fix since smtpd.py is deprecated and will likely not
get any future development. Please see aiosmtpd as a much better third party
replacement.
--
nosy: +barry
resolution: -> wont fix
stage: pat
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
I'm closing this as won't fix since smtpd.py is deprecated and will likely not
get any future development. Please see aiosmtpd as a much better third party
replacement.
--
resolution: -> wont fix
stage: patch review -&
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
I'm closing this as won't fix since smtpd.py is deprecated and will likely not
get any future development. Please see aiosmtpd as a much better third party
replacement.
--
nosy: +barry
resolution: -> wont fix
stage: -&
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
I'm closing this as won't fix since smtpd.py is deprecated and will likely not
get any future development. Please see aiosmtpd as a much better third party
replacement.
--
resolution: -> wont fix
stage: -> resolved
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
I'm closing this as won't fix since smtpd.py is deprecated and likely won't see
much future improvements. Please take a look at aiosmtpd as a much better
third party replacement.
--
resolution: -> wont fix
stage: ne
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
I'm closing this as won't fix simce smtpd.py is deprecated and likely won't see
any future improvements. Please take a look at aiosmtpd as a much better third
party replacement.
--
resolution: -> wont fix
stage: -&
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
I'm closing this as won't fix since smtpd.py is deprecated and likely won't see
any fixes. Please take a look at aiosmtpd as a much better third party
replacement.
--
resolution: -> wont fix
stage: -> resolved
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
I'm going to close this as won't fix since smtpd.py is deprecated, and there's
little chance that folks are still interested in working on it. See aiosmtpd
as a much better third party replacement.
--
resolution: ->
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
smtpd.py is deprecated so there's really almost zero chance we'll be doing any
development on it. Please check out
http://aiosmtpd.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
for a third party replacement (maybe pulled into the stdlib f
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Jan 9, 2018, at 08:33, Paul Ganssle <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> @Barry I don't think it's a good idea to duplicate the `replace`
> functionality in `datetime` like that. I think the main problem isn't the
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
The .replace(microseconds=0) hack annoys me too, but I'd be happier with a
simpler solution: make datetime.now() accept a microseconds parameter, so
datetime.now(microseconds=0) would be equivalent to
datetime.now().replace(microsec
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
nosy: +barry
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32522>
___
__
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Jan 6, 2018, at 13:33, Zachary Ware <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> I notice that my 'Installed' builder
> (http://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/103) has been broken since PR4911
> landed. My sus
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Jan 6, 2018, at 11:26, Andres Petralli <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/Users/andy/Desktop/test.py", line 3, in
>str(uuid.uuid1())
> File
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
Next up - implementing the ResourceReader ABC.
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
New changeset deae6b451fefd5fd3143dd65051e1d341e5a5f84 by Barry Warsaw in
branch 'master':
bpo-32248 - Implement importlib.resources (#4911)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/deae6b451fefd5fd3143dd65051e1d341e
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
@yselivanov - thanks for adding this, it's a huge win.
I think the feature is significant enough for a What's New entry.
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://
New submission from Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
Currently get_data() only accepts a string. It should also accept a os.PathLike
--
messages: 309178
nosy: barry, brett.cannon
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: ResourceLoader.get_data() should accept a Pa
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Dec 29, 2017, at 08:40, Nick Coghlan <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> I'm not clear on what you mean about allowing arbitrary names for the
> instance creation function -
What I meant was that I don’t se
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Dec 26, 2017, at 18:17, Antoine Pitrou <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> I'd really like it if we could get rid of the Setup/Setup.dist thing. It's a
> distraction to have to type `cp -f Modules/Setup.dist Module
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Dec 25, 2017, at 18:51, Nick Coghlan <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> 3. A for-subclasses-only "self._clone()" API could work as follows:
>
>def _clone(self, new_instance=None)
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
PR 4911 implements the importlib.resources API, along with tests and
documentation.
@brett.cannon - I'm thinking we should do the native ResourceReader
implementations for the built-in loaders as a separate
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
pull_requests: +4805
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32248>
___
_
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
I have the tests and code ported, but there are still a few things to do, but
here's a question:
We're using type annotations in importlib_resources, which of course is the
right decision. But I think we still have a moratorium on
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
nosy: +barry
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue20891>
___
__
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
nosy: +barry
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32333>
___
__
New submission from Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
Along the lines of Issue32303 there's another inconsistency in namespace
package metadata. Let's say I have a namespace package:
>>> importlib_resources.tests.data03.namespace
The package has no __file__ attrib
New submission from Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
Let's say I have a namespace package:
>>> importlib_resources.tests.data03.namespace
This package has a non-None __loader__ but a None __spec__.loader:
>>> importlib_resources.tests.dat
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
nosy: +barry
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue21762>
___
__
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
nosy: +barry
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31554>
___
__
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
I wasn't even aware that pop_all() tries to create the concrete subtype. I
wonder how common subclassing ExitStack is in practice. (Of course, the answer
is that we'll never know.)
For 3.7, we should probably delegate instance cr
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
It's possible that the Mailman example can just assume that the mailbox will be
flushed and unlocked on __exit__(), so it could just call .close(). Then the
question is whether entering the CM should lock the mailbox. The two
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Dec 10, 2017, at 14:36, Raymond Hettinger <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> We can remove the word "normal" but otherwis
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
nosy: +barry
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32263>
___
__
New submission from Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
We intend to port importlib_resources to Python 3.7 as importlib.resources,
with a provisional API. There's also a ResourceReader ABC to include, along
with documentation and tests.
Nosying Brett and assigning to myself, but if
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
LGTM, and thanks!
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32199>
___
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
Yes, I think this is a good idea. Would you like to submit a PR for it?
FWIW, we have this code in Mailman 3:
class Mailbox(MMDF):
"""A mailbox that interoperates with the 'with' statement."
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
> Maybe we should just close this issue as 'wont fix' then.
I would be okay with any of these resolutions:
* Close as `wont fix`
* Just call `ip link` (without list)
* Add a new getter such that both `ip link` and `ip link list` a
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Dec 6, 2017, at 02:06, Xavier de Gaye <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Whatever the change made to fix this issue, it is not possible to add a test
> case for this change.
Even with say, exception raising mocks f
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Dec 5, 2017, at 16:28, Xavier de Gaye <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> The result of various 'ip' commands on Android, the last 'ip link list'
> command is run as root and succeeds (did not think abo
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
Over in the PR I suggested:
Here's another thought: what if you just added another getter that calls ip
link list and placed that after one that calls ip link. Wouldn't that
accomplish both goals? Then if ip link fails, we fal
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
I missed it too. Serhiy, do you want to add that fix to your already open PR
4677?
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
> Sorry, but I can't understand how 23df2d1304ece169d7e0dfc843dfb8026b413d9f
> could break getnode() on Android and how your changes can fix this. The only
> effect of this change is that an error in _random_getnode() no lon
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
nosy: +barry
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32192>
___
__
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bu
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
New changeset 23cc8c0f9ece32f1f96133b9db2cb30c64f23a0e by Barry Warsaw in
branch '3.6':
[3.6] bpo-32107 - Backport bitmask check fix (GH-4576) (#4591)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/23cc8c0f9ece32f1f96133b9db2cb30c64
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
New changeset 56e444f8df34cd502d6e3b110c90aed086883a72 by Barry Warsaw in
branch '2.7':
[2.7] bpo-32107 - Backport bitmask check fix (GH-4576) (#4590)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/56e444f8df34cd502d6e3b110c90aed086
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
New changeset 23df2d1304ece169d7e0dfc843dfb8026b413d9f by Barry Warsaw in
branch 'master':
bpo-32107 - Improve MAC address calculation and fix test_uuid.py (#4600)
https://github.com/python/cpython/
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
nosy: +barry
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32158>
___
__
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
title: test_uuid uses the incorrect bitmask -> Improve MAC address calculation
and fix test_uuid.py
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
pull_requests: +4520
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32107>
___
_
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Nov 27, 2017, at 18:38, STINNER Victor <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> The commit 9522a218f7dff95c490ff359cc60e8c2af35f5c8 broke multip
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Nov 27, 2017, at 16:21, Ned Deily <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> The latest checkin seems to have broken several buildbots:
>
> http://buildbot.python.org/all/#builders/47/builds/243
> http://buildbot.
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Nov 27, 2017, at 16:08, Serhiy Storchaka <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> We shouldn't check the 42nd bit in maintenance releases. This check will fail
> on some computers.
Oh, without the preferential retu
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
pull_requests: +4515
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32107>
___
_
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
pull_requests: +4514
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32107>
___
_
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Nov 27, 2017, at 15:18, Serhiy Storchaka <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> My apologies for my dim comment and my obliviousness that leaded to spending
> your time on trying to fix a wrong issue.
No worries at all
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
New changeset 9522a218f7dff95c490ff359cc60e8c2af35f5c8 by Barry Warsaw in
branch 'master':
bpo-32107 - Better merge of #4494 (#4576)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/9522a218f7dff95c490ff359cc60e8c2af
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Nov 27, 2017, at 01:24, Serhiy Storchaka <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> 3. Makes methods for getting the address of the real network card preferring
> universally administered addresses and falling back to
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
PR #4576 includes all related changes.
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
pull_requests: +4504
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32107>
___
_
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Nov 26, 2017, at 14:07, Serhiy Storchaka <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Universally/locally administered MAC addresses doesn't have relation to this
> issue. My assumption was about the multicast bit (1<<
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Nov 26, 2017, at 12:40, Serhiy Storchaka <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka+cpyt...@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> If I understand correctly, the original problem
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Nov 23, 2017, at 11:24, Serhiy Storchaka <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> Wait, now I understand the purpose of the current test! There is just a typo
> in a comment, should be 41 instead of 47. The test
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
On Nov 21, 2017, at 15:47, Serhiy Storchaka <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> If your fix is correct (and it looks correct to me), we should fix not only
> the test, but, first of all, the _*_getnode functions. Perhaps the
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
Yikes. It's entirely possible that these tests are tainted by environmental
leakage. I was looking into why Travis fails on my PR:
https://travis-ci.org/python/cpython/jobs/305433725
and stepping through _ifconfig_getnode() on
Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org> added the comment:
Pure chance I believe. It all depends on the MAC address of the machines the
test runs on (which is perhaps an unacceptable environmental variability in the
test suite, and should be fixed/mocked?).
FWIW, I saw the failures on m
Change by Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +4431
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
New submission from Barry A. Warsaw <ba...@python.org>:
The check_node() function in test_uuid.py uses the wrong bitmask, causing the
tests to fail on valid MAC addresses. Also, the description in the comment is
incorrect. From my reading of the wikipedia page, the test is trying to
401 - 500 of 2236 matches
Mail list logo
