Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 22:09 +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
teardown
Why should they? It's only an implementation choice, and not a wise one
I would say (precisely because people
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 23:06 +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
The main use case for addCleanup is resource allocation in tests. Why
does this require clean ups to be executed before
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 07:25 +, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com added the comment:
I think some perspective is required on this enhancement request. I
originally filed this issue -- http://bugs.python.org
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 10:15 +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Our experience in bzr (we use this heavily, and migrated to it
incrementally across our 17K fixture suite) is that we
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 21:31 +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
So, we are talking about adding a feature that could cause problem whether
cleanup is performed before tearDown or after
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 23:49 +, Michael Foord wrote:
As an interesting data point, the Bzr code does clean ups *before*
tearDown.
No it doesn't:
We subclass unittest.TestCase. We also override run() to make tearDown
run
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 23:57 +, Michael Foord wrote:
Michael Foord mich...@voidspace.org.uk added the comment:
My apologies - the jml code on launchpad runs clean ups before taerDown.
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jml/testtools
New submission from Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net:
Original mail:
JML's testtools has a TestResult subclass with a done() method. The
reason for this method is to allow doing things after the last test has
run. While a result can infer 'first test' it can't infer 'last test'
without
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:
Now, some refinements, as usual (for me at least) when considering a
feature like this from an upstream perspective, where one's immediate
use cases are just special cases not general case, I've come up with
some refinements.
Firstly
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:
I've written up a patch for this; it works with old result classes too.
Hopefully the bugtracker will attach it in reply to this mail; if not
I'll put in via the webui this evening.
-Rob
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http
Robert Xiao nneon...@gmail.com added the comment:
Have you tried this with xml.dom.minidom?
--
nosy: +nneonneo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5762
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 23:19 +, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
Barry A. Warsaw ba...@python.org added the comment:
The patch looks fine to me, except that it's missing documentation
updates. The feature and names are fine too.
Where
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:
Updates - docs, and fixes a couple of stubbed out upcalls in the logging
result put in while bootsrapping.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13709/start-stop-TestRun.patch
___
Python
Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com added the comment:
Skip, it doesn't appear that the ustack helper is getting incorporated
into the OS X build anywhere. This rule is obviously wrong (compiling
the wrong input file with the wrong flags):
Include/phelper.h: $(srcdir)/Include/phelper.d
Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com added the comment:
Got a bit farther. Adding this stanza to the top of phelper.d gets past
the issues in the headers:
#ifdef __APPLE__
#define _SYS_TIME_H_
#define _SYS_SELECT_H_
#define __MATH_H__
#define _OS__OSBYTEORDER_H
#define _FD_SET
#define
Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com added the comment:
This is on an Intel Core 2 Duo running OS X 10.5.6. __i386 is defined.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4111
Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com added the comment:
John, -Z does not appear to help:
$ sudo dtrace -Z -n 'pid$target::PyEval_EvalFrameEx:entry' -c python
dtrace: description 'pid$target::PyEval_EvalFrameEx:entry' matched 0 probes
I'm not sure how that would help. If I'm reading the man
Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com added the comment:
Skip Perhaps not quite on-topic for this tracker item, but it bugs me
that the
Skip mere compilation of a D script requires root privileges.
It doesn't. dtrace -G and dtrace -h (the only mere compilation
that dtrace does) run without root
Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com added the comment:
Ah, duh, of course. The problem here with PyEval_EvalFrameEx is that I
don't have ceval.o on the command line *at all* since OS X's dtrace
doesn't support -G. It doesn't appear to accept ceval.o with -h, either,
so I suppose that adding
Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hmm, wait a second. Never mind. The Solaris patches don't have ceval.o
on the line for compiling phelper.o, either.
If dtrace needs to resolve the symbol PyEval_EvalFrameEx in an object
file, how does it know to look in ceval.o
Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com added the comment:
Is there any interest in my expanding the list of probes? Ruby has quite
a few more than function-entry and function-return, to give some
examples of what is possible:
http://dev.joyent.com/projects/ruby-dtrace/wiki/Ruby+DTrace+probes
Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com added the comment:
We could probably merge Apple's and Sun's probes without too much
trouble. Apple simply extended function-entry to include the argcount in
addition to Sun's (filename, funcname, lineno) arguments. We could use
Apple's probe while retaining
Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com added the comment:
James McIlree from Apple has informed me on dtrace-discuss that ustack
helpers cannot currently be built on OS X. Bummer.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org
Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com added the comment:
Ah, I misread the Apple function-return probe code. Its extra argument
is the type name of the return object or error if an exception was
raised, not the returned object itself. Could be useful
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 23:17 +, Michael Foord wrote:
Michael Foord mich...@voidspace.org.uk added the comment:
Proper patch and proper issue this time! Not my evening.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13787
New submission from Robert Schuppenies robert.schuppen...@gmail.com:
Running this code:
import weakref
class C: pass
...
ws = weakref.WeakSet([C])
if ws == 1:
... print(1)
...
gives me the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:
Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't the offset parameter just another
way of spelling
buffer(input, offset)?
I like the avoiding of copying, just wondering if having a magic
parameter to get a tuple is really better than (say
Robert Schuppenies robert.schuppen...@gmail.com added the comment:
Here is a patch which will return False instead of TypeError. This is
the same behavior a normal set has. Two things though.
1. I don't know wether the 'import _abcoll' statement somehow influences
the bootstrap in one way
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:
Well, I think its relatively uncommon to be doing such a loop with a
static buffer anyway - often you'll instead be reading from disk or a
network stream; if we could make those cases simpler and avoid copying
that would be great
Robert Schuppenies robert.schuppen...@gmail.com added the comment:
Sounds right to me. Here is another patch plus tests.
Going through the other tests, I adapted two more tests to actually test
WeakSet. Also, I found the following one and think it is a copypaste
from test_set which
Changes by Robert Schuppenies robert.schuppen...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file13955/_weakrefset.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5964
Changes by Robert Schuppenies robert.schuppen...@gmail.com:
--
stage: needs patch - patch review
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5964
New submission from Robert Lehmann lehman...@gmail.com:
There are a few errors in the ctypes documentation covering function
calls using the example of `libc.printf`. It's basically just typos but
they are really confusing when trying to understand the examples.
Patch to trunk is attached
Robert Schuppenies robert.schuppen...@gmail.com added the comment:
The test passes on my machine, but a quick review would definitely be
nice :)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5964
Robert Schuppenies robert.schuppen...@gmail.com added the comment:
If that is the right behavior then yes. Is this documented somewhere?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5964
Robert Schuppenies robert.schuppen...@gmail.com added the comment:
Maybe because I take the doc too specfic. It says A rich comparison
method may return the singleton NotImplemented if it does not implement
the operation for a given pair of arguments.
I see the type check of the 'other' object
Robert Schuppenies robert.schuppen...@gmail.com added the comment:
Fixed in r72751.
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5964
Robert Cronk cron...@gmail.com added the comment:
I have had this problem with 2.6.1 on windows from multiple _threads_
instead of multiple processes. Is that not supported either? If not,
what is the workaround for logging from multiple threads? Shouldn't it
be easy to use a semaphore
Robert Cronk cron...@gmail.com added the comment:
I will go through the code and make sure I am not mistaken, but I do
believe I have a single process, multiple threads, and only one handler
for this file and I'm getting the same types of error messages shown on
this page. I'm probably doing
Robert Lehmann lehman...@gmail.com added the comment:
This only seems to be the case with the C implementation of json (_json).
json.encoder.c_make_encoder = None
json.dumps(OrderedDict(items))
'{one: 1, two: 2, three: 3, four: 4, five: 5}'
I think the culprit is encoder_listencode_dict
Robert Cronk cron...@gmail.com added the comment:
I have a small script that reproduces the problem. I couldn't
reproduce it until I added some os.system() calls in the threads that
were logging. Here's the output using python 2.6.1:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File C:\Python26
Robert Cronk cron...@gmail.com added the comment:
P.S. The above script and failure is running on winxp sp3. Also, if
you comment out the two os.system() calls, it works just fine. They
seem like they should be unrelated to the logging though. You'll also
see some errors about access
Robert Cronk cron...@gmail.com added the comment:
import sys
print sys.version
2.6.1 (r261:67517, Dec 4 2008, 16:51:00) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]
I have seen this behavior in older versions as well. Interesting to
see it fail in linux as well
Robert Cronk cron...@gmail.com added the comment:
P.S. Frans - It's good to get these other data points from you. So
this is reproducible from another person and on different versions of
python AND on different platforms! I wasn't expecting that at all.
Thanks Frans.
Is there a way we
Robert Cronk cron...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks Lowell - good information. You have many more versions of
Python laying around than I do. ;)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4749
Robert Cronk cron...@gmail.com added the comment:
I just upgraded to 2.6.2 windows from python.org and it fails as well:
Python 2.6.2 (r262:71605, Apr 14 2009, 22:40:02) [MSC v.1500 32 bit
(Intel)] on win32
I hope Vinay can track this down in case it's a race condition that's
just moving
Robert Cronk cron...@gmail.com added the comment:
I didn't care about the os.system() call contention because that's what
caused the logging problem and that blah.txt file contention should not
cause logging to fail.
I also had the join calls originally but took them out to simplify the
code
Robert Cronk cron...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks Vinay. I ran the newest revised script with virus protection
turned off and got the same failures as before (see console output
below).
If you comment out the os.system() calls, everything works just fine.
Uncomment them and logging
Robert Cronk cron...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'll thoroughly look through every piece of software that's running to
see if I can turn eveything off that might be causing the problem.
Were you able to reproduce the problem with my original script? I'm
sure you have all of your virus
Robert Cronk cron...@gmail.com added the comment:
I turned off anti-virus again as well as file indexing and google
desktop too and still got the errors when I disabled the locks around
the os.system() calls.
Vinay - when the locks aren't around the os.system() calls, do you get
the rotating
Robert Cronk cron...@gmail.com added the comment:
Vinay - that's great news! Are you going to create a new bug for this issue
with a proper title? It would seem to me that the fix for this would be to put
locks internal to the os.system() call around where it spawns cmd so multiple
spawns
Robert Cronk cron...@gmail.com added the comment:
I changed the script to use subprocess (attached file) and got the same
rollover errors as before. I had to change cd and del to be cd.bat and
del.bat which contained cd %1 and del %1 respectively since it appears
subprocess can't run
Robert Cronk cron...@gmail.com added the comment:
Could this problem be associated with issue4749? It was found that
something goes wrong when two cmd children processes are spawned from
different threads, when the first exits, it is closing file handles
shared with the first (or something
Robert Cronk cron...@gmail.com added the comment:
I found Issue1425127 which may be a different symptom of this core
problem. I suggested that we create a bug that documents the core
problem here as described by Vinay in msg89174 and links to these two
bugs (along with any others we find
Robert Cronk cron...@gmail.com added the comment:
One more possibly related bug is issue2320 where subprocesses are
spawned from multiple threads. They found an interesting workaround
that I found seems to help our problem too: on Windows, if close_fds
is true then no handles
Robert Cronk cron...@gmail.com added the comment:
Could this problem be associated with issue4749? It was found that
something goes wrong when two cmd children processes are spawned from
different threads, when the first exits, it is closing file handles
shared with the first (or something
New submission from Robert Collins:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/testtools/+bug/1245672 was filed on testtools
recently. It would be easier to fix that if there was some way that something
loading a test suite could check to see if there were import errors. The
current code nicely works
New submission from Robert Copperwhite:
Hello,
I've recently installed ipython (Anaconda) and haven't managed to get up and
running. When I execute ipython notebook from the command prompt I get the
attached error message, basically: Errno 10013: An attempt was made to access
a socket
Robert Collins added the comment:
I concur that this is a regression -
unittest.expectedFailure()
Mark the test as an expected failure. If the test fails when run, the test
is not counted as a failure.
is in the public docs for the unittest module, and depending on a private
Robert Collins added the comment:
Oh! I didn't realise it was due to us looking at a private exception - I
haven't been given a traceback to review, just the statement of a problem
We shouldn't have done that(and *Definitely* should have filed a bug that we
needed to).
So - I think
Robert Kuska added the comment:
There is ongoing discussion on pip's github tracker [1] about default location
where to install user modules.
IMO this is something that should be dealt with in Python Interpreter Core
[2][3]. I would like to hear some opinion from python devs on this.
[1
Robert Kuska added the comment:
Ok, I have started a thread at pypa-devs google group.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pypa-dev/r6qsAmJl9t0
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1298835
New submission from Robert Snoeberger:
While embedding the Python interpreter in an application, I have encountered a
crash when the built-in function 'super' is invoked with no arguments. The
crash occurs during a call to PyObject_Call.
A file is attached, super_invoke.c, that reproduces
New submission from Robert Snoeberger:
While embedding the Python 2.7 interpreter in an application, I have
encountered a crash when the built-in function 'execfile' is invoked with one
argument.
A file is attached, execfile_invoke.c, that reproduces the crash. The
reproduction steps on my
Robert Snoeberger added the comment:
I created a patch to add a check for NULL globals or locals. The file
execfile.patch is attached. A system error is set with the message globals and
locals cannot be NULL if either is NULL.
An open question I have is how should I create tests
New submission from Robert Jordens:
According to the documentation the exec a in b, c is equivalent to exec(a,
b, c). But in the testcase below the tuple form causes a SyntaxError while the
statement form works fine.
diff -r e770d8c4291c Lib/test/test_compile.py
--- a/Lib/test
New submission from Robert w:
outer for loop loops n 1 times, when it should loop one time.
Variations are possible tht the bug doesn't occur.
--
components: Interpreter Core
files: bug.py
messages: 219513
nosy: Robert.w
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: List Dict
Changes by Robert w robert...@googlemail.com:
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21630
___
___
Python-bugs
New submission from Robert w:
outer for loop loops more than one time, which should be impossible.
--
components: Interpreter Core
files: bug.py
messages: 219514
nosy: Robert.w
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: List/Dict Combination Bug
type: behavior
versions
Robert w added the comment:
banner
C:\Users\r0b3\files\backuped\own_dropbox\programmierung\raymarcher0C:\Python33\python
Python 3.3.2 (v3.3.2:d047928ae3f6, May 16 2013, 00:06:53) [MSC v.1600 64 bit
(AMD64)] on win32
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
C:\Users\r0b3
Changes by Robert w robert...@googlemail.com:
--
versions: +Python 3.4
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21631
___
___
Python-bugs
Robert w added the comment:
i cutted it down
=
class EnumSectionContentType(object):
DATABYTE = 2
DATADOUBLEWORD = 3
DATAWORD = 4
#LABEL = 0
def _getStringOfElements(elements):
objectFileString =
elements = [{'type': 2, 'data': {'elements': ['83H', '0FAH', '9AH', '27H
New submission from Robert Li:
Failing test case: \tboo\n \tghost
expected: \tboo\n\tghost
returns: \tboo\n \tghost
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 221277
nosy: pitrou, r.david.murray, robertjli, yjchen
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title
Robert Li added the comment:
YJ and I are adding a patch and an additional test.
--
hgrepos: +258
versions: -Python 2.7, Python 3.4
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21827
Changes by Robert Li li.robertj+pythonb...@gmail.com:
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35727/cb18733ce8f1.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21827
Changes by Robert Li li.robertj+pyt...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35731/34e88a05562f.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21827
New submission from Robert Lehmann:
CodecInfo objects as retrieved from codecs.lookup currently throw an exception
when trying to copy or pickle them.
I have attached a patch with a fix and tests.
--
components: Library (Lib)
files: copy_codecinfo.patch
keywords: patch
messages
Robert Kuska added the comment:
Hi everyone,
I went ahead and I've applied ssl-backport.diff (alex, 2014-08-07 18:49) patch
into Python 2.7.8 on Fedora Rawhide (currently only scratch build).
My report:
Firstly, I've encountered seg fault, I fixed this with patch from
http://bugs.python.org
New submission from Robert Snoeberger:
import fractions
fractions.gcd(16, float('inf'))
Traceback (most recent call last):
File pyshell#1, line 1, in module
fractions.gcd(16, float('inf'))
File C:\Python34-32bit\lib\fractions.py, line 24, in gcd
a, b = b, a%b
KeyboardInterrupt
Robert Collins added the comment:
I think we rather need a test that using a load_tests hook to recursively load
and transform a subdir works. Hacking on that now.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16662
Robert Collins added the comment:
Ok, implementation I'm happy with is up in
https://bitbucket.org/rbtcollins/cpython/commits/bbf2eb26dda8f3538893bf3dc33154089f37f99d
--
hgrepos: +269
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36482/16662_passing_tests.diff
Robert Collins added the comment:
The doc part of the patch was assuming this would be in 3.4 which it wasn't.
Updated to 3.5. Also found a corner case - when packages were imported the
_get_module_from_name method was not guarded for un-importable modules. This is
strictly a separate issue
Robert Collins added the comment:
Thanks for landing this barry, there's a couple quirks with your improvements -
loadTestsFromModule(mod, foo, bar) will raise a TypeError but not warn about
foo the way loadTestsFromModule(mod, foo) will.
Secondly, the TypeError has an off-by-one error in its
Robert Collins added the comment:
OH! One more thing I just spotted, which is that this change causes
non-'discover' unittest test loading to invoke load_tests.
IMO this is the Right Thing - its what I intended when I described the protocol
a few years back, but we should document
Robert Collins added the comment:
Its more than just a docs issue - AFAICT it isn't possible to tell if closefd
is set after the object is created.
The presence of the parameter in the signature is there, but it isn't
documented *where the bulk of the FileIO parameters are* - there are docs
Robert Collins added the comment:
Oh - the the 'open' function docs are fine - they are just a pointer. I was
specifically referring to the class docs around line 513 of Doc/library/io.rst.
Attached is a patch that changes repr to show this attribute and extends the
docs to document
Robert Collins added the comment:
@michael - ah I think I inverted the sense of the old parameter. It was
defaulting True. So - no need to document anything extra:)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16662
Robert Collins added the comment:
Here is an implementation. I'm probably missing some finesse in the docs.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36577/issue19746.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Robert Collins added the comment:
I've just put a patch up for the related issue http://bugs.python.org/issue19746
I'll poke at this one briefly now, since I'm across the related code.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Robert Collins added the comment:
Ok, here is an implementation that I believe covers everything Michael wanted.
I examined the other patches, and can rearrange my implementation to be more
like them if desired - but at the heart of this this bug really has two
requested changes:
- deferred
Robert Collins added the comment:
@Terry in principle you're right, there are an arbitrary number of things that
can go wrong, but in practice what we see is either catastrophic failure where
nothing is loaded at all *and* no error is returned or localised failure where
the deferred reporting
Robert Collins added the comment:
You may need to apply the patch from http://bugs.python.org/issue19746 first as
well - I was testing with both applied.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7559
Robert Collins added the comment:
This is what I see in my tree:
E
==
ERROR: test_os (unittest.loader.ModuleImportFailure)
--
Traceback (most recent call last
Robert Collins added the comment:
Raced with your comment. Great - and thanks!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7559
Robert Collins added the comment:
Thanks; I'm still learning how to get the system here to jump appropriately :).
I thought I'd told hg to reset me to trunk...
You are right about the docs. Reading that, I thought it was saying that
errors would have a list of the errors that show up
New submission from Robert Collins:
python -m unittest discover -t . foo
where foo is a package
will not trigger load_tests in foo/__init__.py.
To reproduce:
mkdir -p demo/tests
cd demo
cat EOF tests/__init__.py
import sys
import os
def load_tests(loader, tests, pattern):
print(HI WE
Robert Collins added the comment:
I can certainly write the reporter glue to work with either a string or a full
reference. Note that the existing late-reporting glue captures the import error
into a string, and then raises an exception containing that string - so what
I've done is consistent
Robert Collins added the comment:
This should fix this issue :)
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36694/issue22457.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22457
Robert Collins added the comment:
I've managed to get a windows setup working. Its my mini-vfs which needs to be
Windows aware (because the abs path of /foo is C:\\foo). I'll work up a patch
tomorrowish.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Robert Collins added the comment:
Fix up the tests patch - tested on windows 7.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36713/fix-windows-tests.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16662
301 - 400 of 1065 matches
Mail list logo
