[issue38424] typing.Generator shorthand

Dima Tisnek added the comment: Clearly my attention span does not exceed 5 paragraphs, so sorry! -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue38424] typing.Generator shorthand

Ivan Levkivskyi added the comment: Actually Serhiy is right, I just checked and found this sentence: ``` Alternatively, annotate your generator as having a return type of either Iterable[YieldType] or Iterator[YieldType] ``` -- resolution: -> works for me stage: -> resolved status:

[issue38424] typing.Generator shorthand

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: It is already documented, with examples. I do not think the documentation can be made better. -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker

[issue38424] typing.Generator shorthand

Change by Ivan Levkivskyi : -- assignee: -> docs@python components: +Documentation -Library (Lib) nosy: +docs@python ___ Python tracker ___

[issue38424] typing.Generator shorthand

Ivan Levkivskyi added the comment: If you would like to propose a doc fix, then please go ahead and make a PR. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue38424] typing.Generator shorthand

Change by Ivan Levkivskyi : -- nosy: +levkivskyi ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue38424] typing.Generator shorthand

Dima Tisnek added the comment: Actually yes it is sufficient. I don't know why I didn't think of that! Perhaps some note in the docs could help other lost children of Python :P -- ___ Python tracker

[issue38424] typing.Generator shorthand

Benjamin Peterson added the comment: Is Iterator[Whatever] not sufficient for you? -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson ___ Python tracker ___

[issue38424] typing.Generator shorthand

New submission from Dima Tisnek : Currently to annotate a generator, something like `Generator[str, None, None]` is required. Which is a bit confusing and verbose. Can we allow shorthand, like `Generator[str]` for simple cases? I'm not entirely certain what the semantics ought to be... Maybe