[issue45948] Unexpected instantiation behavior for xml.etree.ElementTree.XMLParser(target=None)

Change by Serhiy Storchaka : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue45948] Unexpected instantiation behavior for xml.etree.ElementTree.XMLParser(target=None)

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: New changeset cc6d8f88289917d67237a10f7a0e2439fde7a573 by Jacob Walls in branch '3.9': [3.9] bpo-45948: Remove constructor discrepancy in C version of ElementTree.XMLParser (GH-31152) (GH-31299)

[issue45948] Unexpected instantiation behavior for xml.etree.ElementTree.XMLParser(target=None)

Change by Jacob Walls : -- pull_requests: +29458 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31299 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue45948] Unexpected instantiation behavior for xml.etree.ElementTree.XMLParser(target=None)

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset b7a65c939c93e7910abc8c9d4a129ff385714824 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.10': bpo-45948: Remove constructor discrepancy in C version of ElementTree.XMLParser (GH-31152)

[issue45948] Unexpected instantiation behavior for xml.etree.ElementTree.XMLParser(target=None)

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: New changeset 168fd6453b5de15236116f9261d64601d92571ac by Jacob Walls in branch 'main': bpo-45948: Remove constructor discrepancy in C version of ElementTree.XMLParser (GH-31152)

[issue45948] Unexpected instantiation behavior for xml.etree.ElementTree.XMLParser(target=None)

Change by miss-islington : -- nosy: +miss-islington nosy_count: 5.0 -> 6.0 pull_requests: +29451 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31292 ___ Python tracker

[issue45948] Unexpected instantiation behavior for xml.etree.ElementTree.XMLParser(target=None)

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: I do not think it is a backwards incompatible change, but concur with the rest said by Stefan. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue45948] Unexpected instantiation behavior for xml.etree.ElementTree.XMLParser(target=None)

Stefan Behnel added the comment: This is a backwards incompatible change, but unlikely to have a wide impact. I was thinking for a second if it's making the change in the right direction because it's not unreasonable to pass "None" for saying "I want no target". But it's documented this way

[issue45948] Unexpected instantiation behavior for xml.etree.ElementTree.XMLParser(target=None)

Change by Serhiy Storchaka : -- components: +Extension Modules nosy: +serhiy.storchaka versions: +Python 3.10, Python 3.11, Python 3.9 -Python 3.8 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue45948] Unexpected instantiation behavior for xml.etree.ElementTree.XMLParser(target=None)

Change by Ned Deily : -- nosy: +eli.bendersky, scoder ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue45948] Unexpected instantiation behavior for xml.etree.ElementTree.XMLParser(target=None)

Change by Jacob Walls : -- keywords: +patch nosy: +jacobtylerwalls nosy_count: 1.0 -> 2.0 pull_requests: +29329 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31152 ___ Python tracker

[issue45948] Unexpected instantiation behavior for xml.etree.ElementTree.XMLParser(target=None)

New submission from Robert Steed : Expected instantiation of xml.etree.ElementTree.XMLParser(target=None) to create a parser using default TreeBuilder -- components: XML files: XMLParserFail.py messages: 407458 nosy: rdsteed priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: