[issue46336] Sixth element of tuple from __reduce__(), inconsistency between pickle and copy

Irit Katriel added the comment: I added Serhiy as the author of the deepcopy optimization. Although it was the first to use the 6th item, it is not documented so I wonder if it's the easier of the two to change. -- nosy: +iritkatriel ___ Python

[issue46336] Sixth element of tuple from __reduce__(), inconsistency between pickle and copy

Change by Irit Katriel : -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue46336] Sixth element of tuple from __reduce__(), inconsistency between pickle and copy

Change by Éric Araujo : -- nosy: +pitrou, rhettinger versions: +Python 3.10, Python 3.11, Python 3.9 ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue46336] Sixth element of tuple from __reduce__(), inconsistency between pickle and copy

New submission from Lev Bishop : As discussed in discord thread https://discuss.python.org/t/sixth-element-of-tuple-from-reduce-inconsistency-between-pickle-and-copy/12902 where guido suggested to open this issue. Both the pickle and copy modules of the standard library make use of a class’s