On 06/20/2015 10:50 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
Here is Eric Snow:
| Keep in mind that by immutability I'm talking about*really*
| immutable, perhaps going so far as treating the full memory space
| associated with an object as frozen. For instance, we'd have to
| ensure that immutable Python
In a message of Sat, 20 Jun 2015 19:50:21 -0700, Rustom Mody writes:
Here is Eric Snow:
| Keep in mind that by immutability I'm talking about *really*
| immutable, perhaps going so far as treating the full memory space
| associated with an object as frozen. For instance, we'd have to
| ensure
On Sunday, June 7, 2015 at 10:04:37 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
Ok now rewrite that para above with
s/tuple/numbers like 3 or 666/
So I put '3' on the ram and grind it to finest powder.
Have all trinities (of religious or secular
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
Recent thread on python ideas
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2015-June/034177.html
Since python's immutable ≠ really immutable, we now need a really
immutable
That's because it requires mutable memory
On Sunday, June 21, 2015 at 8:03:18 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
Recent thread on python ideas
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2015-June/034177.html
Since python's immutable ≠ really immutable, we now need a really
El 07/06/15 12:20, Rustom Mody escribió:
On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 10:20:49 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 01:20 pm, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 3:30:23 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
Congrats! You just proved that an object can itself be
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok now rewrite that para above with
s/tuple/numbers like 3 or 666/
So I put '3' on the ram and grind it to finest powder.
Have all trinities (of religious or secular variety) disappeared?
666 gone has the devil been
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 11:13:52 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
You just repeated what Chris said, replacing 'immutable' with 'same'
There was a list: [1,2,3]
On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 10:20:49 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 01:20 pm, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 3:30:23 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
Congrats! You just proved that an object can itself be immutable, but
can contain references
On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 11:13:52 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
You just repeated what Chris said, replacing 'immutable' with 'same'
There was a list: [1,2,3]
At some point that list is found to be(come) [1,2,3,4]
They dont look
Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 10:20:49 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 01:20 pm, Rustom Mody wrote:
As a parallel here is Dijkstra making fun of AI-ers use of the word
'intelligent'
you can use yield structure in python for multiple return. ex:
def func(a):
yield a*2
print a*2
yield a*3
print a*3
...
data = func(5) -- data = (10,15,... )
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:57 AM, fl rxjw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just see the tutorial says Python can return
yield structure can able to you that return list of return by nest in
function. for example you want send a value as enter value to function and
wanna after some calculate send value as return data. 2 way for this :
a) send data as a list
b) send data with yield
example:
a)
def func(a):
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 03:57 am, fl wrote:
Excuse me. I input the following according to your idea, but I do not
understand how to use it from the echo. It does not show how to use
the multiple output results. I am a new Python user. Please give a little
more explanation if you could.
Tnx Steven,
You are right completly.I try more subtilize
thanks for your hint.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info
wrote:
Hi Amir, and welcome!
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 02:38 am, Amir Arsalan wrote:
you can use yield structure in python for multiple return. ex:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 03:32 pm, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 10:20:49 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 01:20 pm, Rustom Mody wrote:
As a parallel here is Dijkstra making fun of AI-ers use of the word
'intelligent'
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 03:28 pm, Rustom Mody wrote:
There was a list: [1,2,3]
At some point that list is found to be(come) [1,2,3,4]
They dont look same to me.
When you pour water into an empty bottle, does it turn into a different
bottle?
When you append items to a list (or remove them), it is
On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 11:27:29 PM UTC+5:30, fl wrote:
On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 9:39:19 AM UTC-7, Amir Arsalan wrote:
you can use yield structure in python for multiple return. ex:
def func(a):
yield a*2
print a*2
yield a*3
print a*3
...
Hi Amir, and welcome!
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 02:38 am, Amir Arsalan wrote:
you can use yield structure in python for multiple return. ex:
def func(a):
yield a*2
print a*2
yield a*3
print a*3
...
data = func(5) -- data = (10,15,... )
That's actually wrong. If you run:
On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 9:39:19 AM UTC-7, Amir Arsalan wrote:
you can use yield structure in python for multiple return. ex:
def func(a):
yield a*2
print a*2
yield a*3
print a*3
...
data = func(5) -- data = (10,15,... )
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:57 AM,
Alain Ketterlin al...@universite-de-strasbourg.fr.invalid:
Grant Edwards invalid@invalid.invalid writes:
[...]
Or to be a bit obtuse: Python parameters are passed by value, but all
values are references.
Exactly, that's a perfect description. There's is no need for a new
name. As a
Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info writes:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 04:17 am, Alain Ketterlin wrote:
Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info writes:
[...]
But you still find a few people here and there who have been exposed to
Java foolishness, and will argue that Python is pass by value, where
Grant Edwards invalid@invalid.invalid writes:
[...]
Or to be a bit obtuse: Python parameters are passed by value, but all
values are references.
Exactly, that's a perfect description. There's is no need for a new
name. As a corollary, all names (including variables and object
attributes) are
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015, at 22:37, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
That's not a reference to the value. That's a string that describes the
object.
Well, of course. None of these things are strings.
The normal human-readable representation of a reference is an arrow on a
diagram, pointing from a box that
On 05/06/2015 02:48, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 11:40 am, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 05/06/2015 01:16, BartC wrote:
On 05/06/2015 00:13, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 06:52 am, BartC wrote:
On 04/06/2015 18:11, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
If there is
any language where
Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net writes:
Alain Ketterlin al...@universite-de-strasbourg.fr.invalid:
Grant Edwards invalid@invalid.invalid writes:
[...]
Or to be a bit obtuse: Python parameters are passed by value, but all
values are references.
Exactly, that's a perfect description.
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 01:16 pm, Rustom Mody wrote:
Consider the C canonical linked-list example (of some type T):
struct node
{
T elem;
struct node *next;
};
Is the list in C to be identified with 'struct node'?
Lists in C are not first class values. There is no one thing which can
On Friday, June 5, 2015 at 4:36:35 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 01:16 pm, Rustom Mody wrote:
The abstract platonic immutable list is non-existent in python
Just pretend that immutable list is spelled tuple.
Ok lets say I make no fuss about the need to 'pretend'.
random...@fastmail.us:
The normal human-readable representation of a reference is an arrow on
a diagram, pointing from a box that represents the variable to a box
that represents the object. But I can't exactly put that in a
text-based email.
An *lvalue* is anything that can be assigned to:
On Wednesday, June 3, 2015 at 2:57:00 PM UTC-7, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 03/06/2015 22:35, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Thomas Rachel
nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa...@spamschutz.glglgl.de
wrote:
Am 03.06.2015 um 01:56 schrieb Chris Angelico:
and
On 04/06/2015 15:37, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2015-06-04, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info:
But you still find a few people here and there who have been exposed
to Java foolishness, and will argue that Python is pass by value,
where the value is an
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, June 5, 2015 at 4:36:35 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 01:16 pm, Rustom Mody wrote:
The abstract platonic immutable list is non-existent in python
Just pretend that immutable list is
On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 8:58:13 AM UTC+5:30, rand...@fastmail.us wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, at 23:20, Rustom Mody wrote:
The word immutuable happens to have existed in English before python.
I also happen to have used it before I knew of python
The two meanings do not match
I am
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com wrote:
You just repeated what Chris said, replacing 'immutable' with 'same'
There was a list: [1,2,3]
At some point that list is found to be(come) [1,2,3,4]
They dont look same to me.
I'm going shopping, can you get me the
On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 10:20:49 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 01:20 pm, Rustom Mody wrote:
As a parallel here is Dijkstra making fun of AI-ers use of the word
'intelligent'
http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD06xx/EWD618.html
Nice rant,
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
This does not happen:
mylist = []
mytuple = (None, 1, mylist)
mylist.append(0)
= raises an exception
The *tuple* is immutable, not the list.
What you could have is a FrozenList (by analogy with
On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 3:30:23 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Friday, June 5, 2015 at 4:36:35 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 01:16 pm, Rustom Mody wrote:
The abstract platonic immutable list is
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 1:28 PM, random...@fastmail.us wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, at 23:20, Rustom Mody wrote:
The word immutuable happens to have existed in English before python.
I also happen to have used it before I knew of python
The two meanings do not match
I am surprised
Is that
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015, at 23:20, Rustom Mody wrote:
The word immutuable happens to have existed in English before python.
I also happen to have used it before I knew of python
The two meanings do not match
I am surprised
Is that surprising?
They don't match only if you consider the objects a
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 01:20 pm, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 3:30:23 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
Congrats! You just proved that an object can itself be immutable, but
can contain references to mutables. Ain't that awesome?
Did you have a point?
[Under assumption
On Friday, June 5, 2015 at 3:46:47 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 03:26 am, random832 wrote:
If the value really were 23, the is vs == problem wouldn't exist.
What problem? is versus == is not a problem, it is a feature. The two
operators do two different things.
On 2015-06-04, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 04:38 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
But, discussing pass-by-this vs. pass-by-that without also discussing
the semantics of the assignment operator is rather pointless.
No, that's a red-herring.
I don't think so. ??The
On Friday, June 5, 2015 at 8:07:41 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 08:59 am, random832 wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015, at 18:16, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Remember, you've tried to claim that it is not invisible or unknown, so
you
must be able to see and know that value.
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 08:59 am, random...@fastmail.us wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015, at 18:16, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Remember, you've tried to claim that it is not invisible or unknown, so
you
must be able to see and know that value. So what is the value?
It doesn't have to have a string
On 05/06/2015 01:16, BartC wrote:
On 05/06/2015 00:13, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 06:52 am, BartC wrote:
On 04/06/2015 18:11, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
If there is
any language where assignment uses one style and argument passing
always
uses another, I've never come across it.
On 05/06/2015 00:13, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 06:52 am, BartC wrote:
On 04/06/2015 18:11, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
If there is
any language where assignment uses one style and argument passing always
uses another, I've never come across it.
My language does that. I'd be very
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 11:40 am, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 05/06/2015 01:16, BartC wrote:
On 05/06/2015 00:13, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 06:52 am, BartC wrote:
On 04/06/2015 18:11, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
If there is
any language where assignment uses one style and argument
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
You need at least one more test to prove pass by value: you need to
demonstrate that the value bound to y is copied when passed to the
function. E.g. pass a mutable value (say, a list) and mutate it inside the
function.
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 03:30 am, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info:
On 2015-06-04, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
If it prints 1, it's pass by value. If it prints 3, it's pass by
reference.
Wrong. Why do you [Marko] imagine that pass-by-value and
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 04:38 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
But, discussing pass-by-this vs. pass-by-that without also discussing
the semantics of the assignment operator is rather pointless.
No, that's a red-herring.
I don't think so. The reason that many people seem to confused about
Python's
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015, at 18:16, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Remember, you've tried to claim that it is not invisible or unknown, so
you
must be able to see and know that value. So what is the value?
It doesn't have to have a string representation to exist. But if you
really want one?
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 06:52 am, BartC wrote:
On 04/06/2015 18:11, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
If there is
any language where assignment uses one style and argument passing always
uses another, I've never come across it.
My language does that. I'd be very surprised if it was the only one in
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 03:26 am, random...@fastmail.us wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015, at 09:47, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
In other words, according to this Java philosophy, following `x = 23`,
the
value of x is not 23 like any sane person would expect, but some
invisible
and unknown, and unknowable,
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 03:30 am, random...@fastmail.us wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015, at 13:11, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
You need at least one more test to prove pass by value: you need to
demonstrate that the value bound to y is copied when passed to the
function. E.g. pass a mutable value (say, a
On 04/06/2015 18:11, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
If there is
any language where assignment uses one style and argument passing always
uses another, I've never come across it.
My language does that. I'd be very surprised if it was the only one in
existence that does so.
Assignments involve a
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 04:17 am, Alain Ketterlin wrote:
Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info writes:
[...]
But you still find a few people here and there who have been exposed to
Java foolishness, and will argue that Python is pass by value, where the
value is an implementation dependent
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 04:38 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
But, discussing pass-by-this vs. pass-by-that without also discussing
the semantics of the assignment operator is rather pointless.
No, that's a red-herring.
I don't
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015, at 09:47, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
In other words, according to this Java philosophy, following `x = 23`,
the
value of x is not 23 like any sane person would expect, but some
invisible
and unknown, and unknowable, reference to 23.
Well, no, because, in Java, if the type of
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Now does Python pass by value or by reference? Happily sits back and waits
for 10**6 emails to arrive as this is discussed for the 10**6th time.
Troll.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015, at 13:11, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
You need at least one more test to prove pass by value: you need to
demonstrate that the value bound to y is copied when passed to the
function. E.g. pass a mutable value (say, a list) and mutate it inside
the
function. If the list in the
Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info:
On 2015-06-04, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
If it prints 1, it's pass by value. If it prints 3, it's pass by
reference.
Wrong. Why do you [Marko] imagine that pass-by-value and
pass-by-reference are the only two options?
It's a classic
On 2015-06-04, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 12:37 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2015-06-04, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
Anyway, I would say Python definitely is in the classic pass-by-value
camp. Here's a simple test:
def f(x):
x = 3
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 12:37 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2015-06-04, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
Anyway, I would say Python definitely is in the classic pass-by-value
camp. Here's a simple test:
def f(x):
x = 3
y = 1
f(y)
print(y)
If it prints 1, it's pass
On 06/04/2015 11:26 AM, random...@fastmail.us wrote:
Of course, in CPython, the type of an object reference is PyObject *.
Which isn't invisible, unknown, or unknowable, either.
If the value really were 23, the is vs == problem wouldn't exist.
Surely two objects can hold the same value, or
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015, at 13:36, Michael Torrie wrote:
Surely two objects can hold the same value, or represent the same value
(number), without *having* to be the same object. I don't see why
people would assume, let alone demand that different objects
representing the same value be the same
Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info writes:
[...]
But you still find a few people here and there who have been exposed to Java
foolishness, and will argue that Python is pass by value, where the value
is an implementation dependent reference to the thing that you thought was
the value.
I
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
But you still find a few people here and there who have been exposed to Java
foolishness, and will argue that Python is pass by value, where the value
is an implementation dependent reference to the thing that you thought was
the value.
To quote Niklaus Wirth (the
On 2015-06-04, Marko Rauhamaa ma...@pacujo.net wrote:
Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info:
But you still find a few people here and there who have been exposed
to Java foolishness, and will argue that Python is pass by value,
where the value is an implementation dependent reference to the
On Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:28 am, sohcahto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, June 3, 2015 at 2:57:00 PM UTC-7, Mark Lawrence wrote:
[...]
Now does Python pass by value or by reference? Happily sits back and
waits for 10**6 emails to arrive as this is discussed for the 10**6th
time.
People
Grant Edwards invalid@invalid.invalid:
Anyway, I would say Python definitely is in the classic pass-by-value
camp. Here's a simple test:
def f(x):
x = 3
y = 1
f(y)
print(y)
If it prints 1, it's pass by value. If it prints 3, it's pass by
reference.
Somebody else
On 06/03/2015 04:28 PM, sohcahto...@gmail.com wrote:
People actually argue that Python passes by value? This is easily
proven wrong by passing a mutable object to a function and changing
it within the function.
Sure but if you reassign the variable that was passed it, it has no
effect
Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info:
But you still find a few people here and there who have been exposed
to Java foolishness, and will argue that Python is pass by value,
where the value is an implementation dependent reference to the thing
that you thought was the value.
Why fight
On 03.06.15 02:56, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 7:27 AM, fl rxjw...@gmail.com wrote:
I just see the tutorial says Python can return value in function, it does
not say multiple data results return situation. In C, it is possible.
How about Python on a multiple data return
On 04/06/2015 19:34, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Now does Python pass by value or by reference? Happily sits back and waits
for 10**6 emails to arrive as this is discussed for the 10**6th time.
Troll.
True indeed.
As
On Wednesday, June 3, 2015 at 2:57:00 PM UTC-7, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 03/06/2015 22:35, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Thomas Rachel
nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa...@spamschutz.glglgl.de
wrote:
Am 03.06.2015 um 01:56 schrieb Chris Angelico:
and
On 03/06/2015 22:35, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Thomas Rachel
nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa...@spamschutz.glglgl.de
wrote:
Am 03.06.2015 um 01:56 schrieb Chris Angelico:
and it's pretty convenient. In C, the nearest equivalent is passing a
number of
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Thomas Rachel
nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa...@spamschutz.glglgl.de
wrote:
Am 03.06.2015 um 01:56 schrieb Chris Angelico:
and it's pretty convenient. In C, the nearest equivalent is passing a
number of pointers as parameters, and having the
Am 03.06.2015 um 01:56 schrieb Chris Angelico:
and it's pretty convenient. In C, the nearest equivalent is passing a
number of pointers as parameters, and having the function fill out
values. Python's model is a lot closer to what you're saying than C's
model is :)
At least, C functions can
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015, at 17:56, Mark Lawrence wrote:
Now does Python pass by value or by reference? Happily sits back and
waits for 10**6 emails to arrive as this is discussed for the 10**6th
time.
Python's in that same awkward space as Java, where it technically passes
by value, but the
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wlfr...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 15:28:56 -0700 (PDT), sohcahto...@gmail.com declaimed
the following:
People actually argue that Python passes by value? This is easily proven
wrong by passing a mutable object to a function and
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 7:27 AM, fl rxjw...@gmail.com wrote:
I just see the tutorial says Python can return value in function, it does
not say multiple data results return situation. In C, it is possible.
How about Python on a multiple data return requirement?
Technically, neither C nor Python
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:27 PM, fl rxjw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just see the tutorial says Python can return value in function, it does
not say multiple data results return situation. In C, it is possible.
How about Python on a multiple data return requirement?
Thanks,
--
In 3bbe49da-e989-4a8c-a8a9-75d3a786f...@googlegroups.com fl
rxjw...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
I just see the tutorial says Python can return value in function, it does
not say multiple data results return situation. In C, it is possible.
How about Python on a multiple data return requirement?
On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 2:27:37 PM UTC-7, fl wrote:
Hi,
I just see the tutorial says Python can return value in function, it does
not say multiple data results return situation. In C, it is possible.
How about Python on a multiple data return requirement?
Thanks,
You return a
Hi,
I just see the tutorial says Python can return value in function, it does
not say multiple data results return situation. In C, it is possible.
How about Python on a multiple data return requirement?
Thanks,
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
85 matches
Mail list logo
