Bernardo Sulzbach writes:
> Thanks for quoting, for some reason my client always replies to the
> person and not the list (on this list only).
You have a “reply to sender” command in your mail client; every client
has that. It seems that is what you used (it might
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach
wrote:
> This got a little big. I accidentally did not change the address from
> Sven's to the list and emailed him. Seconds later, he replied to the
> list quoting my entire message so that I wouldn't have to send it
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 08:50 am, Ben Finney wrote:
> (You will also have a “reply to all” command. That's almost never
> appropriate in a forum like this.)
If your mail client lacks Reply To List, use Reply All and then manually
edit the To addresses of the new message. It honestly isn't hard, I've
For this list, and this list only (I likely could identify the issue
by comparing raw messages, but I won't bother), when I hit 'r' I get
the sender of the latest message. In this case, "ros...@gmail.com". So
I have to start typing "pyt" to change it to the list, double tab to
body, type, then
This got a little big. I accidentally did not change the address from
Sven's to the list and emailed him. Seconds later, he replied to the
list quoting my entire message so that I wouldn't have to send it to
the list too (after his reply, which would make it hard to
understand). I thanked him for
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach
wrote:
> For this list, and this list only (I likely could identify the issue
> by comparing raw messages, but I won't bother), when I hit 'r' I get
> the sender of the latest message. In this case, "ros...@gmail.com".
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016, at 16:50, Ben Finney wrote:
> (You will also have a “reply to all” command. That's almost never
> appropriate in a forum like this.)
Why not? People reply all to messages I write all the time, and I find
it somewhat useful since it separates replies to things I have said from