[Python-modules-team] Bug#815631: sphinx: Use alternatives to provide scripts under /usr/bin

2016-02-23 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Kevin, On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:24:40PM +1100, Kevin Murray wrote: > Ah yes, that's true about hardcoding. This is actually why I need this: > hardcoded occurrences of sphinx-build in makefiles that aren't in python > projects but use (and only work with) python3 packages. And thanks for the

[Python-modules-team] Bug#815631: sphinx: Use alternatives to provide scripts under /usr/bin

2016-02-23 Thread Kevin Murray
Hi Dmitry, Thanks for your advice. On 10:19 23/02, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 02:34:11PM +1100, Kevin Murray wrote: > > I have recently needed to use a python3-only sphinx build process on a > > system with both python-sphinx & python3-sphinx co-installed.

[Python-modules-team] Bug#815631: sphinx: Use alternatives to provide scripts under /usr/bin

2016-02-22 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Kevin, On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 02:34:11PM +1100, Kevin Murray wrote: > I have recently needed to use a python3-only sphinx build process on a > system with both python-sphinx & python3-sphinx co-installed. IMHO > co-installation > could be a little cleaner and easier if sphinx: > > - Used

[Python-modules-team] Bug#815631: sphinx: Use alternatives to provide scripts under /usr/bin

2016-02-22 Thread Kevin Murray
Source: sphinx Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I have recently needed to use a python3-only sphinx build process on a system with both python-sphinx & python3-sphinx co-installed. IMHO co-installation could be a little cleaner and easier if sphinx: - Used update-alternatives to provide