On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:57:48AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
BLOCK_OP_TYPE_MIRROR_REPLACE is checked and blocked by
block-job-complete
during the time the mirror finish when an arbitrary node of the graph
must be
replaced.
It seems to me mirror unblocks this
On Mon, 09/15 15:17, Benoît Canet wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:48:33AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Tue, 09/09 14:28, Benoît Canet wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 01:56:46PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 22.08.2014 um 18:11 hat Benoît Canet geschrieben:
Since the block layer code is
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:48:33AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Tue, 09/09 14:28, Benoît Canet wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 01:56:46PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 22.08.2014 um 18:11 hat Benoît Canet geschrieben:
Since the block layer code is starting to modify the BDS graph right in
Am 10.09.2014 um 17:49 hat Benoît Canet geschrieben:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:14:35AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/10/2014 02:54 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
Let's think of a situation that recursive blockers protect but
backing_blocker does not:
a - b - c - d
c is the backing
On Tue, 09/09 14:28, Benoît Canet wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 01:56:46PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 22.08.2014 um 18:11 hat Benoît Canet geschrieben:
Since the block layer code is starting to modify the BDS graph right in
the
middle of BDS chains (block-mirror's replace parameter
On Thu, 09/04 21:42, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 06:45:54AM +, Benoît Canet wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:42:04PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Mon, 08/25 12:12, Benoît Canet wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 05:37:37PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Mon, 08/25
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:54:19PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Thu, 09/04 21:42, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 06:45:54AM +, Benoît Canet wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:42:04PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Mon, 08/25 12:12, Benoît Canet wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25,
On 09/10/2014 02:54 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
Let's think of a situation that recursive blockers protect but
backing_blocker does not:
a - b - c - d
c is the backing file and is therefore protected by the op blocker.
The block-commit command works with node-names, however, so we can
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:14:35AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/10/2014 02:54 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
Let's think of a situation that recursive blockers protect but
backing_blocker does not:
a - b - c - d
c is the backing file and is therefore protected by the op blocker.
The
On Wed, 09/10 09:14, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/10/2014 02:54 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
Let's think of a situation that recursive blockers protect but
backing_blocker does not:
a - b - c - d
c is the backing file and is therefore protected by the op blocker.
The block-commit command
Am 22.08.2014 um 18:11 hat Benoît Canet geschrieben:
Since the block layer code is starting to modify the BDS graph right in the
middle of BDS chains (block-mirror's replace parameter for example) QEMU needs
to properly block and unblock whole BDS subtrees; recursion is a neat way to
achieve
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 01:56:46PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 22.08.2014 um 18:11 hat Benoît Canet geschrieben:
Since the block layer code is starting to modify the BDS graph right in the
middle of BDS chains (block-mirror's replace parameter for example) QEMU
needs
to properly block
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 06:45:54AM +, Benoît Canet wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:42:04PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Mon, 08/25 12:12, Benoît Canet wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 05:37:37PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Mon, 08/25 09:06, Benoît Canet wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:42:04PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Mon, 08/25 12:12, Benoît Canet wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 05:37:37PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Mon, 08/25 09:06, Benoît Canet wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:04:24PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Fri, 08/22 18:11,
On Fri, 08/22 18:11, Benoît Canet wrote:
Since the block layer code is starting to modify the BDS graph right in the
middle of BDS chains (block-mirror's replace parameter for example) QEMU needs
to properly block and unblock whole BDS subtrees; recursion is a neat way to
achieve this task.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:04:24PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Fri, 08/22 18:11, Benoît Canet wrote:
Since the block layer code is starting to modify the BDS graph right in the
middle of BDS chains (block-mirror's replace parameter for example) QEMU
needs
to properly block and unblock
On Mon, 08/25 09:06, Benoît Canet wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:04:24PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Fri, 08/22 18:11, Benoît Canet wrote:
Since the block layer code is starting to modify the BDS graph right in
the
middle of BDS chains (block-mirror's replace parameter for example)
On Mon, 08/25 12:12, Benoît Canet wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 05:37:37PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Mon, 08/25 09:06, Benoît Canet wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:04:24PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Fri, 08/22 18:11, Benoît Canet wrote:
Since the block layer code is starting to
Since the block layer code is starting to modify the BDS graph right in the
middle of BDS chains (block-mirror's replace parameter for example) QEMU needs
to properly block and unblock whole BDS subtrees; recursion is a neat way to
achieve this task.
This patch also takes care of modifying the op
19 matches
Mail list logo
