On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 03:14:07AM +, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Peter Xu
> >Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2023 11:42 PM
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] intel_iommu: Fix a potential issue in VFIO dirty
> >page sync
> &g
>-Original Message-
>From: Peter Xu
>Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2023 11:42 PM
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] intel_iommu: Fix a potential issue in VFIO dirty
>page sync
>
...
>> >> a/include/exec/memory.h b/include/exec/memory.h index
>>
at.com; richard.hender...@linaro.org; edua...@habkost.net;
> >marcel.apfelb...@gmail.com; alex.william...@redhat.com;
> >c...@redhat.com; da...@redhat.com; phi...@linaro.org;
> >kwankh...@nvidia.com; c...@nvidia.com; Liu, Yi L ; Peng,
> >Chao P
> >Subject: Re: [PATC
william...@redhat.com;
>c...@redhat.com; da...@redhat.com; phi...@linaro.org;
>kwankh...@nvidia.com; c...@nvidia.com; Liu, Yi L ; Peng,
>Chao P
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] intel_iommu: Fix a potential issue in VFIO dirty
>page sync
>
>On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 02:33:18PM +080
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 02:33:18PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> Peter Xu found a potential issue:
>
> "The other thing is when I am looking at the new code I found that we
> actually extended the replay() to be used also in dirty tracking of vfio,
> in vfio_sync_dirty_bitmap(). For that maybe
