Re: data compression error

2005-02-11 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:22:47AM -0200, Andreas Hasenack wrote: I'm having some errors with the DATAZ extension between some sites and was wondering if anybody has seen these before. The error is: 451 Receiving compressed data failed: incorrect data check #(4.3.0) I tested this mailing

Re: data compression error

2005-02-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 01:42:12PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: The very first version of the DATAZ extension had a problem with bigger attachements but this should be fixed for more than a year. The message was very simple and small actually. Just: test in the body. No attachments. Would

RE: Disk I/O problems with Qmail-LDAP

2005-02-11 Thread Fernando Maior
Another thing is that we are using courier-imapd since the users access their mail directories using IMAP and NOT POP3. Is there anything I can check on the servers to see if Courier-IMAP is also a big factor in the disk i/o bottleneck? I know this may not be the right thread to ask this, but

Re: data compression error

2005-02-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 01:42:12PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: The very first version of the DATAZ extension had a problem with bigger attachements but this should be fixed for more than a year. Can you recall specifically which version had this fixed? I would like to try to patch just this

Re: data compression error

2005-02-11 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 02:38:19PM -0200, Andreas Hasenack wrote: On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 01:42:12PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: The very first version of the DATAZ extension had a problem with bigger attachements but this should be fixed for more than a year. Can you recall specifically

Re: data compression error

2005-02-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 05:58:53PM +0059, Claudio Jeker wrote: The changelog has a hint about this, but only for qmqpd (version qmail-ldap-1.03-20031101a.patch): NEWS for current stuff: Nasty bugfix in qmail-qmqpd with compression turned on. On slow links large mails could cause

Re: ARG... now pop auth patch doesn't work

2005-02-11 Thread Matt
Well yes.. and it IS more secure IF you are able to enfore secure passwords. On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:29:13 -0600, Omar Armas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El Mié 09 Feb 2005 11:20, Matt escribió: To respond to OMAR: I agree.. SMTP-AUTH is nice except for this reason: You have 60,000

smtp after pop already in qmail-ldap

2005-02-11 Thread Mr. David
Hi, I am trying to apply smtp after pop patch from this site in qmail-ldap, http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ldap/patches/smtp-after-pop/smtp-after-pop-20010801.patch I am getting errors. Is this patch already part of qmail-ldap? Thanks, -David

Re: smtp after pop already in qmail-ldap

2005-02-11 Thread Ted Fines
On Feb 11, 2005, at 9:24 PM, Mr. David wrote: Hi, I am trying to apply smtp after pop patch from this site in qmail-ldap, http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ldap/patches/smtp-after-pop/smtp-after- pop-20010801.patch I am getting errors. Is this patch already part of qmail-ldap? Thanks, -David

Re: smtp after pop already in qmail-ldap

2005-02-11 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
Hi, I am trying to apply smtp after pop patch from this site in qmail-ldap, http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ldap/patches/smtp-after-pop/smtp-after-pop-20 010801.patch I am getting errors. Is this patch already part of qmail-ldap? It is part of 20020501 patch. You can always check QLDAPNEWS