[Rd] Grid Graphics Documentation: color specification with gpar() (PR#14013)

2009-10-18 Thread tom . gottfried
Full_Name: Tom Gottfried Version: 2.9.2 OS: Mac OS X 10.4.11 Submission from: (NULL) (93.104.160.207) Dear R-Developers, on the help page for gpar() is the following paragraph: Specifying the value NULL for a parameter is the same as not specifying any value for that parameter, except for col

Re: [Rd] Rscript not returning zero

2009-10-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 18 October 2009 at 06:22, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: | On Sat, 17 Oct 2009, Rodrigo Flores wrote: | Is there any way to get the Rscript returning zero ? | | Have a successful script | | You have not told us the 'at a minimum' information asked for in the | posting guide, whereas I get

Re: [Rd] Specifying (set of random) port numbers for the help HTML server (Was: Re: Fixing html help port in 2.10)

2009-10-18 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 17/10/2009 12:08 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Duncan Murdoch murd...@stats.uwo.ca wrote: On 10/16/2009 10:39 AM, Dieter Menne wrote: I noted that the new html-help in 2.10 under Windows uses a random port on my computer. This cause a problem, because when I

Re: [Rd] Specifying (set of random) port numbers for the help HTML server (Was: Re: Fixing html help port in 2.10)

2009-10-18 Thread Dieter Menne
Duncan Murdoch-2 wrote: options(help.ports = sample(6800:6850)) Nice. So just in case I want options(help.ports = sample(6800:6800)) What would be the adverse effects (besides me having to check that that port is reasonable)? Dieter -- View this message in context:

Re: [Rd] Specifying (set of random) port numbers for the help HTML server (Was: Re: Fixing html help port in 2.10)

2009-10-18 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 18/10/2009 11:14 AM, Dieter Menne wrote: Duncan Murdoch-2 wrote: options(help.ports = sample(6800:6850)) Nice. So just in case I want options(help.ports = sample(6800:6800)) What would be the adverse effects (besides me having to check that that port is reasonable)? That will

Re: [Rd] linking to package directories broken in R = 2.10 beta

2009-10-18 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 17/10/2009 1:57 PM, Thomas Petzoldt wrote: Duncan Murdoch wrote: Thomas Petzoldt wrote: [...] This is fine, but in contrast to older versions (= 2.9.2) no automatic index is created for the linked directory, so we now get: URL /library/foo/examples/ was not found but linking to

Re: [Rd] linking to package directories broken in R = 2.10 beta

2009-10-18 Thread Thomas Petzoldt
Duncan Murdoch wrote: [...] The doc directory is known to be visible. It might surprise someone if arbitrary directories were visible, and readable by any user. 2) The change will introduce additional work for package authors that used internal links within their packages. I can, of

Re: [Rd] linking to package directories broken in R = 2.10 beta

2009-10-18 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 18/10/2009 4:45 PM, Thomas Petzoldt wrote: Duncan Murdoch wrote: [...] The doc directory is known to be visible. It might surprise someone if arbitrary directories were visible, and readable by any user. 2) The change will introduce additional work for package authors that used

[Rd] Bug with .First in R 2.10

2009-10-18 Thread Mark.Bravington
Under R2.10.0 beta (2009-10-14 r50082) my .First does not run reliably. I reported this last week, but not reproducibly, and it seemed to go away, so I thought it might be installation-related. But it has now recurred reproducibly, at least on my machine. The website

Re: [Rd] Bug with .First in R 2.10

2009-10-18 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 18/10/2009 6:20 PM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote: Under R2.10.0 beta (2009-10-14 r50082) my .First does not run reliably. I reported this last week, but not reproducibly, and it seemed to go away, so I thought it might be installation-related. But it has now recurred reproducibly, at

Re: [Rd] Bug with .First in R 2.10

2009-10-18 Thread Mark.Bravington
I started the same version of R in my usual starting directory (where there's a larger .RData, whose .First is running OK right now) and then did save( .First, file=whatever) I'm not sure exactly where the .First came from before that; I use a couple of different machines and (in the runup to

[Rd] weird warning in [.data.frame with 2.10

2009-10-18 Thread Mark.Bravington
I'm getting the following warnings under 2.10 v50082 but not v49613 In addition: Warning messages: 1: In `[.data.frame`(df, -(1:nrow(df)), , drop = FALSE) : named arguments other than 'drop' are discouraged 5: In `[.data.frame`(object, !omit, , drop = FALSE) : named arguments other than

Re: [Rd] Specifying (set of random) port numbers for the help HTML server (Was: Re: Fixing html help port in 2.10)

2009-10-18 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Duncan Murdoch murd...@stats.uwo.ca wrote: On 17/10/2009 12:08 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Duncan Murdoch murd...@stats.uwo.ca wrote: On 10/16/2009 10:39 AM, Dieter Menne wrote: I noted that the new html-help in 2.10 under

Re: [Rd] R292 on AIX53 using gcc

2009-10-18 Thread Chuck White
Hello -- after my previous post, I tried to compile R 2.9.2 using xlc. The config.site changes are: == OBJECT_MODE=64 AR=ar -X64 R_SHELL=/usr/bin/bash CONFIG_SHELL=/usr/bin/bash CC=xlc_r -q64 CFLAGS=-O -qstrict CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/include -I/usr/local/include