[Rd] R-2.11.1 build and 'so' libraries withouth the 'lib' prefix

2010-07-12 Thread lI
Greetings, I have a computer with the following setup: 1)cblfs (pure 64-bit (amd64) linux), kernel2.6.34 gcc4.4.2 2)R-2.11.1 I compiled R with BLAS and lapack using the switched ( --with-blas=- lpthread -latlas -lfptf77blas --with-lapack=-llapack -lcblas ). ((

Re: [Rd] Large discrepancies in the same object being saved to .RData

2010-07-12 Thread Martin Maechler
DM == Duncan Murdoch murdoch.dun...@gmail.com on Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:25:45 -0400 writes: DM On 11/07/2010 1:30 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: [] On 7/10/2010 10:10 PM, bill.venab...@csiro.au wrote: Well, I have answered one of my questions below.

Re: [Rd] R-2.11.1 build and 'so' libraries withouth the 'lib' prefix//update

2010-07-12 Thread lI
On Monday 12 July 2010 10:29:30 lI wrote: Greetings, I have a computer with the following setup: 1)cblfs (pure 64-bit (amd64) linux), kernel2.6.34 gcc4.4.2 2)R-2.11.1 I compiled R with BLAS and lapack using the switched ( --with-blas=- lpthread -latlas -lfptf77blas

Re: [Rd] Defining a method that behaves like '$'?

2010-07-12 Thread Renaud Gaujoux
Thanks all. Just to clarify a bit my intention with another '$'-like function. It was due to the nice features of '$': - it hides the internal implementation - it is known by most users so no extra brain-memory is required - it is quick and simple to write, which I think is actually very

Re: [Rd] Large discrepancies in the same object being saved to .RData

2010-07-12 Thread Terry Therneau
I only wish to add a request for further documentation of hidden environments, their consequences, and how to turn them off. Perhaps a page in the Extending R guide, and a suggestion for book authors. I was bitten by this with the coxph frailty functions. They are called during the model

Re: [Rd] R-2.11.1 build and 'so' libraries withouth the 'lib' prefix

2010-07-12 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Jul 12, 2010, at 5:29 AM, lI wrote: Greetings, I have a computer with the following setup: 1)cblfs (pure 64-bit (amd64) linux), kernel2.6.34 gcc4.4.2 2)R-2.11.1 I compiled R with BLAS and lapack using the switched ( --with-blas=- lpthread -latlas -lfptf77blas

Re: [Rd] R-2.11.1 build and 'so' libraries withouth the 'lib' prefix//update

2010-07-12 Thread lI
On Monday 12 July 2010 11:07:23 lI wrote: On Monday 12 July 2010 10:29:30 lI wrote: Greetings, I have a computer with the following setup: 1)cblfs (pure 64-bit (amd64) linux), kernel2.6.34 gcc4.4.2 2)R-2.11.1 I compiled R with BLAS and lapack using the switched ( --with-blas=-

[Rd] How to use mpi.allreduce() in Rmpi?

2010-07-12 Thread Eduardo García
Hi everybody! I have the next code which makes a reduction of the *a *variable in two slaves, using the Rmpi package. library(Rmpi) #get the slaves mpi.spawn.Rslaves(nslaves=2) #slaves will execute this function reduc-function(){ a-mpi.comm.rank()+2 mpi.reduce(a,type=2, op=prod)

Re: [Rd] R-2.11.1 build and 'so' libraries withouth the 'lib' prefix//update

2010-07-12 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Jul 12, 2010, at 2:50 PM, lI wrote: On Monday 12 July 2010 11:07:23 lI wrote: On Monday 12 July 2010 10:29:30 lI wrote: Greetings, I have a computer with the following setup: 1)cblfs (pure 64-bit (amd64) linux), kernel2.6.34 gcc4.4.2 2)R-2.11.1 I compiled R with BLAS and lapack

[Rd] Severe memory problem using split()

2010-07-12 Thread cstrato
Dear all, With great interest I followed the discussion: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-July/057901.html since I have currently a similar problem: In a new R session (using xterm) I am importing a simple table Hu6800_ann.txt which has a size of 754KB only: ann -

[Rd] Strange issues with new R-based 'R CMD build' and 'R CMD check' scripts on Windows

2010-07-12 Thread Hervé Pagès
Hi, Kind of related to the new R-based 'R CMD build' script being sometimes confused on Windows (as reported here a couple of weeks ago https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-June/057759.html), I also started to observe that the new R-based 'R CMD check' script gets also confused sometimes

Re: [Rd] Severe memory problem using split()

2010-07-12 Thread Martin Morgan
On 07/12/2010 01:45 PM, cstrato wrote: Dear all, With great interest I followed the discussion: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-July/057901.html since I have currently a similar problem: In a new R session (using xterm) I am importing a simple table Hu6800_ann.txt which has a

Re: [Rd] Severe memory problem using split()

2010-07-12 Thread cstrato
Dear Martin, Thank you, you are right, now I get: ann - read.delim(Hu6800_ann.txt, stringsAsFactors=FALSE) object.size(ann) 2035952 bytes u2p - split(ann[,ProbesetID],ann[,UNIT_ID]) object.size(u2p) 1207368 bytes object.size(unlist(u2p)) 865176 bytes Nevertheless, a size of 1.2MB for a

Re: [Rd] R-2.11.1 build and 'so' libraries withouth the 'lib' prefix//update

2010-07-12 Thread lI
On Monday 12 July 2010 20:52:15 Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 12, 2010, at 2:50 PM, lI wrote: On Monday 12 July 2010 11:07:23 lI wrote: On Monday 12 July 2010 10:29:30 lI wrote: Greetings, I have a computer with the following setup: 1)cblfs (pure 64-bit (amd64) linux), kernel2.6.34

Re: [Rd] Severe memory problem using split()

2010-07-12 Thread Martin Morgan
On 07/12/2010 03:00 PM, cstrato wrote: Dear Martin, Thank you, you are right, now I get: ann - read.delim(Hu6800_ann.txt, stringsAsFactors=FALSE) object.size(ann) 2035952 bytes u2p - split(ann[,ProbesetID],ann[,UNIT_ID]) object.size(u2p) 1207368 bytes object.size(unlist(u2p)) 865176

Re: [Rd] R-2.11.1 build and 'so' libraries withouth the 'lib' prefix//update

2010-07-12 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Jul 12, 2010, at 5:59 PM, lI wrote: On Monday 12 July 2010 20:52:15 Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 12, 2010, at 2:50 PM, lI wrote: On Monday 12 July 2010 11:07:23 lI wrote: On Monday 12 July 2010 10:29:30 lI wrote: Greetings, I have a computer with the following setup: 1)cblfs (pure

Re: [Rd] R-2.11.1 build and 'so' libraries withouth the 'lib' prefix//update

2010-07-12 Thread lI
On Monday 12 July 2010 23:51:55 Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 12, 2010, at 5:59 PM, lI wrote: On Monday 12 July 2010 20:52:15 Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 12, 2010, at 2:50 PM, lI wrote: On Monday 12 July 2010 11:07:23 lI wrote: On Monday 12 July 2010 10:29:30 lI wrote: Greetings, I