Re: [Rd] binary form of is() contradicts its unary form

On 29 November 2017 at 21:45, Hervé Pagès wrote: > You're missing the point of my original post. Which is that > there is a serious inconsistency between the unary and binary > forms of is(). Maybe the binary form is right in case of My understanding is that there is no

[R-pkg-devel] R package with Swift code

Hello, Does anyone know of an example of a R package that contains Swift code (https://swift.org), like many packages use C code? Thanks Guillaume __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [Rd] binary form of is() contradicts its unary form

Yes, data.frame is not an S4 class but is(data.frame()) finds its super-classes anyway and without the need to wrap it in asS4(). And "list' is one of the super-classes. Then is(data.frame(), "list") contradicts this. I'm not asking for a workaround. I already have one with 'class2 %in%

Re: [Rd] binary form of is() contradicts its unary form

Hi Herve, Interesting observation with `setClass` but it is for S4. It looks like `data.frame()` is not an S4 class. > isS4(data.frame()) [1] FALSE And in your case this might help: > is(asS4(data.frame()), "list") [1] TRUE Looks like `is` is designed for S4 classes, I am not entirely sure.

Re: [Rd] binary form of is() contradicts its unary form

Hi Mehmet, On 11/29/2017 11:22 AM, Suzen, Mehmet wrote: Hi Herve, I think you are confusing subclasses and classes. There is no contradiction. `is` documentation is very clear: `With one argument, returns all the super-classes of this object's class.` Yes that's indeed very clear. So if

Re: [Rd] binary form of is() contradicts its unary form

Hi Herve, I think you are confusing subclasses and classes. There is no contradiction. `is` documentation is very clear: `With one argument, returns all the super-classes of this object's class.` Note that object class is always `data.frame` here, check: > class(data.frame()) [1] "data.frame"

[Rd] binary form of is() contradicts its unary form

Hi, The unary forms of is() and extends() report that data.frame extends list, oldClass, and vector: > is(data.frame()) [1] "data.frame" "list" "oldClass" "vector" > extends("data.frame") [1] "data.frame" "list" "oldClass" "vector" However, the binary form of is()

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Exited with status -1073741819.

Rampal, One additional thought here. Since you reference RTools in your initial post, I presume that this is occurring on Windows, though not sure which version. Have you tried to build the package using the WinBuilder site provided by Uwe? If not, go here:

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Exited with status -1073741819.

You wrote Exited with status -1073741819. The low byte of that status code is 5, which I think means a segmentation fault - reading or writing an address that you do not have permission of use. > as.hexmode(-1073741819) [1] "c005" If your code uses memory that it has not allocated it

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Exited with status -1073741819.

> Rampal S Etienne > on Wed, 29 Nov 2017 14:22:54 +0100 writes: > Dear Marc, Martin, Dason, > I agree that the status number is not very informative, but neither is: > "Package does not build". The point is that I have no clue what is going >

Re: [Rd] Un-informative Error in re-building vignettes

> On Nov 29, 2017, at 10:25 AM, Toby Hocking wrote: > > I am getting the following on CRAN windows and winbuilder > https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64/penaltyLearning-00check.html > > Apparently there is an error in re-building vignettes,

[Rd] Un-informative Error in re-building vignettes

I am getting the following on CRAN windows and winbuilder https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64/penaltyLearning-00check.html Apparently there is an error in re-building vignettes, but I do not have any idea what it is, because all that is listed is three dots (...).

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Exited with status -1073741819.

Dear Marc, Martin, Dason, I agree that the status number is not very informative, but neither is: "Package does not build". The point is that I have no clue what is going on, and was just hoping that someone might have seen the exit status number before. I have done a clean install as suggested

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Exited with status -1073741819.

> Rampal S Etienne > on Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:19:29 +0100 writes: > Dear Dason, > I don't get this error, but it crashes anyway. and you don't show what "crashes" means here. (and yes, Dason is right: The RStudio status number in the 'Subject' is not

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Exited with status -1073741819.

Dear Dason, I don't get this error, but it crashes anyway. I've that if I use the stable version of R (3.4.2) I do NOT get the error anymore, so I assume there is something wrong with the current R-devel. Regards, Rampal Etienne On 29-11-2017 0:36, Dason Kurkiewicz wrote: > Do you get the