Re: [Rd] Inconsistency of c.Date: non-commutativity and non-integer Value

2021-01-22 Thread Gabriel Becker
Hi Jens, On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 1:18 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 22 January 2021 at 21:35, Jens Heumann wrote: > | Dear r-devel, > | > | Today I came across what I would call inconsistencies in the `c.Date` > | method compared to what happens when concatenating other classes: 1. > |

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Rdmacros as Suggests rather than Imports

2021-01-22 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi James, On 22 January 2021 at 15:42, James Pustejovsky wrote: | Thanks very much for your input! By "patch it out" do you mean modify my | package description for the Debian distribution only? Would it work to And code / content! Can't just alter the DESCRIPTION if the Rd still call

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Rdmacros as Suggests rather than Imports

2021-01-22 Thread James Pustejovsky
Dirk, Thanks very much for your input! By "patch it out" do you mean modify my package description for the Debian distribution only? Would it work to create a separate branch of my Github repo with modifications for the Debian distro, and then submit that directly to Debian maintainers? I'm

Re: [Rd] Inconsistency of c.Date: non-commutativity and non-integer Value

2021-01-22 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 22 January 2021 at 21:35, Jens Heumann wrote: | Dear r-devel, | | Today I came across what I would call inconsistencies in the `c.Date` | method compared to what happens when concatenating other classes: 1. | Non-commutativity: The type in the arrangements of the elements does | matter

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Rdmacros as Suggests rather than Imports

2021-01-22 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi James, On 22 January 2021 at 14:29, James Pustejovsky wrote: | I'm writing to see if anyone has suggestions for how to handle an issue I'm | facing with the clubSandwich package ( | https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=clubSandwich; Github repo: | https://github.com/jepusto/clubSandwich). The

[Rd] Inconsistency of c.Date: non-commutativity and non-integer Value

2021-01-22 Thread Jens Heumann
Dear r-devel, Today I came across what I would call inconsistencies in the `c.Date` method compared to what happens when concatenating other classes: 1. Non-commutativity: The type in the arrangements of the elements does matter (first element is critical), 2. the resulting value is numeric

Re: [Bioc-devel] Build failing for package 'fcoex' and I do not know why

2021-01-22 Thread Tiago Lubiana
Hello, Martin, Thank you very much for your reply and sorry about the delay. I have removed the cached files from the repository and added them to .gitignore. I was not running the most updated version of BiocManager, and not using R-devel (my fault, I'm sorry) As you did, now I did:

[R-pkg-devel] Rdmacros as Suggests rather than Imports

2021-01-22 Thread James Pustejovsky
Greetings, I'm writing to see if anyone has suggestions for how to handle an issue I'm facing with the clubSandwich package ( https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=clubSandwich; Github repo: https://github.com/jepusto/clubSandwich). The package documentation uses the fairly new package mathjaxr

Re: [R-pkg-devel] GitHub Actions - CI for pkg that depends on Java/rJava (Windows issue)

2021-01-22 Thread Peter Meissner
Hey, Very interesting. I just made rJava work for Linux: https://github.com/petermeissner/kafkaesque/blob/master/.github/workflows/tests.yml Best, Peter Blätte, Andreas schrieb am Fr. 22. Jan. 2021 um 17:38: > Dear colleagues, > > as recommended by rOpenSci (see >

[R-pkg-devel] GitHub Actions - CI for pkg that depends on Java/rJava (Windows issue)

2021-01-22 Thread Blätte , Andreas
Dear colleagues, as recommended by rOpenSci (see https://ropensci.org/technotes/2020/11/19/moving-away-travis/) , I am moving to GitHub Actions for the CI for my R packages. My test case is the “bignlp” package I currently develop

Re: [Bioc-devel] Change of package mantainer/manager

2021-01-22 Thread Kern, Lori
CTDquerier was removed in Bioconductor 3.12 after being deprecated in 3.11 as it had been failing across all OS platforms since at least 05/31/19 with no response or contact. The package is considered defunct and could be reinstated by re-submitting to the new package tracker. Cheers, Lori