using 'sed'
in Linux.
For some further detail see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix2dos
Hoping this helps,
Ted.
-
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@wlandres.net
Date: 24-Apr-2012 Time: 18:56:21
This message was sent by XFMail
.
-
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@wlandres.net
Date: 05-Apr-2012 Time: 12:21:57
This message was sent by XFMail
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
-
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@wlandres.net
Date: 01-Mar-2012 Time: 20:47:42
This message was sent by XFMail
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman
in the inevitable approximations.
Simply to fail is far too unsophisticated a result!
Hoping this is useful,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@wlandres.net
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 14-Dec-11
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@wlandres.net
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 28-Sep-11 Time: 00:28:37
-- XFMail --
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing
in every context in which the function would be used.
This is basic good practice which, once routinely adopted, should
ensure that the right thing is done every time!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@wlandres.net
Fax-to-email
or character
result, and 'NULL' for a list. (It returns '00' for a raw
result.]
since that seems to imply that x[c(NA,NA)] should return c(NA,NA)
and not rep(NA,length(x))!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@wlandres.net
this helps!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@wlandres.net
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 04-Nov-10 Time: 09:08:37
-- XFMail
]
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 22-Aug-10 Time: 19:49:41
-- XFMail
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 22-Aug-10 Time: 03:13:22
-- XFMail
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 09-Aug-10 Time: 16:37:50
-- XFMail
in a NaN.
So there is nothing anomalous about your results except at -1e+308,
which is where R is at a critical point.
That's how I see it, anway!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 18-Mar-10 Time: 00:57:20
-- XFMail
this helps,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 27-Jan-10 Time: 18:14:57
-- XFMail
.
This distinction is important and useful, so it should not be done
away with by merging NaN and NA!
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 31-Dec-09
,a) ;
fprintf(mystream, %s is %f feet tall\n, Sven, 7.1) ;
would append
Sven is 7.10 feet tall
(followed by a line-break) to myoutput.txt
Hoping this helps!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44
this behaviour by shanging the options.
Hoping this helps,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 07-Nov-09 Time: 13:57:07
this behaviour by shanging the options.
Hoping this helps,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 07-Nov-09 Time: 13:57:07
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 18-Sep-09 Time: 22:35:34
-- XFMail --
__
R
)
Hoping this helps,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 16-Aug-09 Time: 11:55:15
-- XFMail
On 16-Aug-09 14:06:18, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Hello,
On 8/16/09, Ted Harding ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk wrote:
I don't know about *compelling* reasons! But (as a general rule)
if the Alternative Hyptohesis is stated, then the Null Hypothesis
is simply its negation. So, in your example, you
identical();
b) Any complications that may arise when applying this new form
to complex objects.
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 07-Aug-09
] numeric
so R has converted X from class 'logical' to class 'numeric'
on being asked to assign a number to a logical; but in this
case its hands were not tied by colClasses.
Or am I missing something?!!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding
://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email
?
Kjetil
That is surely correct! Since lim[x-(-1)+] gamma(x) = +Inf,
while lim[x-(-1)-] gamma(x) = -Inf, at gamma(-1) one cannot
choose between +Inf and -Inf, so surely is is NaN.
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard
On 30-Mar-09 20:37:51, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 3/30/2009 2:55 PM, (Ted Harding) wrote:
On 30-Mar-09 18:40:03, Kjetil Halvorsen wrote:
With R 2.8.1 on ubuntu I get:
gamma(-1)
[1] NaN
Warning message:
In gamma(-1) : NaNs produced
lgamma(-1)
[1] Inf
Warning message:
value out of range
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 29-Mar-09 Time: 23:08:50
-- XFMail
there is one grammar rule
that does not have an exception. At least there used to be one; I am
not really sure whether that rule survived the recent reform of the
German grammar rules.
Cheers,
Berwin
E-Mail: (Ted
that this possibility should be available.
What do people think?
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 05-Feb-09 Time: 20
Thanks, everyone, for all the responses!
Ted.
On 05-Feb-09 20:48:33, Ted Harding wrote:
Hi Folks,
Maybe I've missed it already being available somehow,
but if the following isn't available I'd like to suggest it.
If you're happy to let plot() choose its own limits,
then of course plot(x,y
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 01-Nov-08 Time: 16:19:56
-- XFMail --
__
R-devel@r
/listinfo/r-devel
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date
]
Hence, by induction, 10:00 is indistinguishable from 11:00
Which you do not want!
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 17-Apr-08
it up.
After that, you can paste from this directly into R, or can
save the file and source() it.
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 27-Feb-08
/(1i^1i)
[1] 4.810477+0i
$i^i = £1
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 13-Feb-08 Time: 15:57:02
to all,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 12-Feb-08 Time: 15:31:26
-- XFMail
of the
above is true in R (e.g. the example above).
So can you devise an isEqual function which will make this
work?
It's only Monday .. plenty of time!
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0
(r){ifelse(r=K/2, 2*r, 2*(K-r))}
For K = 7 and r = 3, this yields r = 3, 6, 2, 4, 6, ...
Dividing this by K=7, one gets the correct period with
approximately correct numbers.
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding
instructions
here: http://9mmedia.com/blog/?p=7).
Thanks so much for sharing your discovery, Mike! Out of the blue!
(Unexpected bonus for being on the R list).
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 16-Jul-07 Time: 14:57:28
-- XFMail --
__
R-devel@r
On 16-Jul-07 13:57:56, Ted Harding wrote:
On 16-Jul-07 13:28:50, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
The formula attribute of the builtin CO2 dataset seems a bit strange:
formula(CO2)
Plant ~ Type + Treatment + conc + uptake
What is one supposed to do with that? Certainly its not suitable
!
best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 16-Jul-07 Time: 15:40:36
-- XFMail
agree!
Ted.
On 7/16/07, Ted Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16-Jul-07 14:16:10, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
Following up on your comments it seems formula.data.frame just
creates
a formula whose lhs is the first column name and whose rhs is made
up
of the remaining column names
the file changes. Thus you can adjust
the bounding box until it is just as you want it.
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 17-Apr-06
of view, as above ... However,
surely the two should be consistent with each other.)
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 03-Feb-06
On 03-Feb-06 Peter Dalgaard wrote:
(Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 03-Feb-06 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Full_Name: Uffe Høgsbro Thygesen
Version: 2.2.0
OS: linux
Submission from: (NULL) (130.226.135.250)
Hello all.
pbinom(q=0,size=0,prob=0.5)
returns
straight on the general issue of
nomenclature.
Best wishes to all,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 17-Sep-05 Time: 10:51:17
47 matches
Mail list logo
