The bug should be fixed in r-devel and 2.13 patched, as of svn rev. 56090.
John
On 6/7/11 12:42 AM, Iago Mosqueira wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:28 PM, John Chambersj...@r-project.org wrote:
This is a bug, medium-subtle, but also raises an interesting software design
point.
The Bug:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:28 PM, John Chambers j...@r-project.org wrote:
This is a bug, medium-subtle, but also raises an interesting software design
point.
The Bug:
Nothing specific about ANY and missing, but the issue is whether the
method was inherited (the ANY case) or defined directly
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, John Chambers wrote:
This is a bug, medium-subtle, but also raises an interesting software design
point.
The Bug:
Nothing specific about ANY and missing, but the issue is whether the
method was inherited (the ANY case) or defined directly (the missing
case).
Generic
Yes, Dylan is in many ways more authoritarian than R! Possibly also
with fewer users to be annoyed.
We might go to a warning as Iago suggests. If we did add a warning, it
would be likely be more useful in the setMethod() call than at CMD check
time, after the package has been designed and
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, John Chambers wrote:
Yes, Dylan is in many ways more authoritarian than R! Possibly also with
fewer users to be annoyed.
Huh? A convention in a programming book is more authoritarian than a
warning as you are proposing (not that I am opposed to that -- I think
it's
Can then the warning be turned off in any way to avoid it showing up
on check? Maybe an argument to confirm 'I know what I am doing so I
need no warning, thank you very much'.
Iago
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:06 PM, John Chambers j...@r-project.org wrote:
Yes, Dylan is in many ways more
On 6/7/11 2:02 PM, Iago Mosqueira wrote:
Can then the warning be turned off in any way to avoid it showing up
on check? Maybe an argument to confirm 'I know what I am doing so I
need no warning, thank you very much'.
Well, this is still new territory since the bug didn't seem to have been
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Martin Morgan mtmor...@fhcrc.org wrote:
On 06/01/2011 04:39 AM, Iago Mosqueira wrote:
Dear all,
I am experiencing some problems with S4 method overloading. I have
defined a generic for graphics:plot, using
setGeneric(plot, useAsDefault = plot)
and with
This is a bug, medium-subtle, but also raises an interesting software
design point.
The Bug:
Nothing specific about ANY and missing, but the issue is whether the
method was inherited (the ANY case) or defined directly (the missing
case).
Generic functions keep a cached table of dispatched
Dear all,
I am experiencing some problems with S4 method overloading. I have
defined a generic for graphics:plot, using
setGeneric(plot, useAsDefault = plot)
and with
importFrom('graphics', 'plot') and
exportMethods('plot') in the NAMESPACE file of pkg A.
I then proceed to define a method
10 matches
Mail list logo
