At 01:09 16/04/2010, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
Speaking as a copious generator of CMD CHECK notes: I don't see that
there's a problem to be solved here-- i.e. I don't see why it's
worth changing good code or adding conventions just to circumvent
CMD CHECK notes. (If the code is bad, of
I think what people are also thinking about is that the policy for
publishing a package on CRAN is that it have to pass R CMD check with
no errors, warnings *or* notes. So, in that sense notes are no
different from warnings.
At least that's why I go about and add some rare ad hoc code patching
Dear all,
I think that notes were introduced precisely to differentiate between
situations that may be innocuous and those that are more serious, the latter
producing warnings and errors. The Rcmdr package, for example, generates
a whack of notes for code that works correctly and that I don't
On Apr 16, 2010, at 4:38 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
I think what people are also thinking about is that the policy for
publishing a package on CRAN is that it have to pass R CMD check with
no errors, warnings *or* notes.
Can you cite your reference, please? I see only (R-ext 1.5
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Apr 16, 2010, at 4:38 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
I think what people are also thinking about is that the policy for
publishing a package on CRAN is that it have to pass R CMD check with
no errors, warnings *or* notes.
Can you cite your
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Thomas Lumley tlum...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Apr 16, 2010, at 4:38 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
I think what people are also thinking about is that the policy for
publishing a package on CRAN is that it have to
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, William Dunlap wrote:
-Original Message-
From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
[mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Henrik Bengtsson
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 8:24 AM
To: Duncan Murdoch
Cc: r-devel; Michael Dewey
Subject: Re: [Rd] R CMD check tells
Speaking as a copious generator of CMD CHECK notes: I don't see that there's a
problem to be solved here-- i.e. I don't see why it's worth changing good code
or adding conventions just to circumvent CMD CHECK notes. (If the code is bad,
of course it should be changed!) As the original poster
-Original Message-
From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
[mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Henrik Bengtsson
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 8:24 AM
To: Duncan Murdoch
Cc: r-devel; Michael Dewey
Subject: Re: [Rd] R CMD check tells me 'no visible binding
for
