Re: [Rd] R Usage Statistics

2009-11-20 Thread Michael Dewey
At 18:47 19/11/2009, Kevin R. Coombes wrote: Hi, I got the following comment from the reviewer of a paper (describing an algorithm implemented in R) that I submitted to BMC Bioinformatics: Finally, which useful for exploratory work and some prototyping, neither R nor S-Plus are appropriate

[Rd] R Usage Statistics

2009-11-19 Thread Kevin R. Coombes
Hi, I got the following comment from the reviewer of a paper (describing an algorithm implemented in R) that I submitted to BMC Bioinformatics: Finally, which useful for exploratory work and some prototyping, neither R nor S-Plus are appropriate environments for deploying user applications

Re: [Rd] R Usage Statistics

2009-11-19 Thread Charles C. Berry
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Kevin R. Coombes wrote: Hi, I got the following comment from the reviewer of a paper (describing an algorithm implemented in R) that I submitted to BMC Bioinformatics: Finally, which useful for exploratory work and some prototyping, neither R nor S-Plus are appropriate

Re: [Rd] R Usage Statistics

2009-11-19 Thread Steven McKinney
. Coombes [krcoom...@mdacc.tmc.edu] Sent: November 19, 2009 10:47 AM To: r-devel@r-project.org Subject: [Rd] R Usage Statistics Hi, I got the following comment from the reviewer of a paper (describing an algorithm implemented in R) that I submitted to BMC Bioinformatics: Finally, which useful

Re: [Rd] R Usage Statistics

2009-11-19 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Nov 19, 2009, at 4:09 PM, Charles C. Berry wrote: On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Kevin R. Coombes wrote: Hi, I got the following comment from the reviewer of a paper (describing an algorithm implemented in R) that I submitted to BMC Bioinformatics: Finally, which useful for exploratory work