Hi.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Seth Falcon s...@userprimary.net wrote:
On 3/22/10 3:57 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
SF == Seth Falcons...@userprimary.net
on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:47:17 -0700 writes:
SF On 3/17/10 9:11 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
Currently library() and
SF == Seth Falcon s...@userprimary.net
on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:47:17 -0700 writes:
SF On 3/17/10 9:11 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
Currently library() and attach() fail to locate an
existing '.conflicts.OK' in a package wit name space,
unless it is exported. Since there
On 3/22/10 3:57 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
SF == Seth Falcons...@userprimary.net
on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:47:17 -0700 writes:
SF On 3/17/10 9:11 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
Currently library() and attach() fail to locate an
existing '.conflicts.OK' in a package wit name
On 3/17/10 9:11 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
Currently library() and attach() fail to locate an existing
'.conflicts.OK' in a package wit name space, unless it is exported.
Since there should be little interest in exporting '.conflicts.OK'
otherwise, one may argue that those methods should look
Currently library() and attach() fail to locate an existing
'.conflicts.OK' in a package wit name space, unless it is exported.
Since there should be little interest in exporting '.conflicts.OK'
otherwise, one may argue that those methods should look for
'.conflicts.OK' even if it is not exported.
