somewhat related to a previous discussion [1] on how 'names-' would
sometimes modify its argument in place, and sometimes produce a modified
copy without changing the original, here's another example of how it
becomes visible to the user when r makes or doesn't make a copy of an
object:
x =
WK == Wacek Kusnierczyk waclaw.marcin.kusnierc...@idi.ntnu.no
on Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:52:19 +0100 writes:
WK somewhat related to a previous discussion [1] on how 'names-' would
WK sometimes modify its argument in place, and sometimes produce a modified
WK copy without changing
WK == Wacek Kusnierczyk waclaw.marcin.kusnierc...@idi.ntnu.no
on Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:56:37 +0100 writes:
WK Martin Maechler wrote:
WK == Wacek Kusnierczyk waclaw.marcin.kusnierc...@idi.ntnu.no
WK somewhat related to a previous discussion [1] on how 'names-' would
WK == Wacek Kusnierczyk waclaw.marcin.kusnierc...@idi.ntnu.no
on Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:11:04 +0100 writes:
WK Martin Maechler wrote:
[.. omitted part no longer relevant ]
WK however, the following has a different pattern:
WK x = NULL
WK
Martin Maechler wrote:
more verbously, all NULL objects in R are identical, or as the
help page says, there's only ``*The* NULL Object'' in R,
i.e., NULL cannot get any attributes.
WK yes, but that's not the issue. the issue is that names(x)- seems to
WK try
