This is all very intriguing. Normally when piping into an operator
function, R throws "Error: function '+' not supported in RHS call of a
pipe":
> 1 |> `+`(2)
Error: function '+' not supported in RHS call of a pipe
This is a different error from the above "invalid use of pipe placeholder",
which
> Hi all,
>
> Surprisingly (at least to me), `as.complex(NA_real_)` results in
> `complex(real = NA_real_, imaginary = 0)` rather than `NA_complex_`.
Well, the logic here is really the mathematical equivalence:
if you turn a real number x in to a complex one, say z,
then z = x + i * 0 ,
Thank you Dirk and Joshua,
Using Valgrind, I have found several memory leaks in the program that required
some smaller rewrites.
Valgrind (with Makevars flags -O0 and --ggdb) now reports no "definitely" and
no "indirectly" lost bytes so that's a small win already.
But two questions remain:
On 22 April 2023 at 14:43, D Z wrote:
| Thank you Dirk and Joshua,
| Using Valgrind, I have found several memory leaks in the program that required
| some smaller rewrites.
| Valgrind (with Makevars flags -O0 and --ggdb) now reports no "definitely" and
| no "indirectly" lost bytes so that's a
Submission of most recent version of lme4 threw a NOTE on CRAN's
Debian platform that we had not seen when running "R CMD check
--as-cran" with the most recent SVN checkout, nor when submitted to
win-builder/R-devel. These are legitimate issues (all now fixed), but
we were taken by surprise
