G'day all,
I just took over maintenance of the quadprog package from Kurt Hornik
and noticed that one of the FORTRAN routines has an argument that is
declared to be a LOGICAL. The R code that calls this routine (via
the .Fortran interface) passes the argument down wrapped in a call to
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Berwin A Turlach wrote:
G'day all,
I just took over maintenance of the quadprog package from Kurt Hornik
and noticed that one of the FORTRAN routines has an argument that is
declared to be a LOGICAL. The R code that calls this routine (via
the .Fortran interface) passes
G'day Brian,
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 12:40:45 +0100 (BST)
Prof Brian Ripley rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Berwin A Turlach wrote:
[...]
Thus, given that the port of quadprog existed for quite some time, I
am wondering whether it is o.k. to pass R objects with storage mode
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Berwin A Turlach wrote:
G'day Brian,
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 12:40:45 +0100 (BST)
Prof Brian Ripley rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Berwin A Turlach wrote:
[...]
Thus, given that the port of quadprog existed for quite some time, I
am wondering whether it
-Original Message-
From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
[mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Prof Brian Ripley
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:41 AM
To: Berwin A Turlach
Cc: r-devel
Subject: Re: [Rd] LOGICAL arguments in FORTRAN code
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Berwin A
Kris Jones kjones at fishsciences.net writes:
Quick answer: this question is inappropriate for the r devel*pment
list (intended for questions about code development, technical questions,
etc.). The main r help list, or the r-sig-ecology list, would be better.
It is true that GAMs are more
