Would R-core be receptive to adding an additional parameter to stopifnot so we
can hide the call in the output as in stop?
i.e. The signature would become:
stopifnot2 <- function (..., exprs, exprObject, local = TRUE, .call = TRUE)
It looks like this would be a one-line change to the the
Hear, hear! Also thank you Uwe and the rest of the CRAN team for all the work
you put in. It is much appreciated!
From: R-devel on behalf of Uwe Ligges
Sent: 08 December 2021 14:24
To: Tomas Kalibera; r-devel
Subject: Re: [Rd] R/CRAN switch to UCRT on
> On 03/02/2022 11:14 Martin Maechler wrote:
>
>
> > Ben Bolker
> > on Tue, 1 Feb 2022 21:21:46 -0500 writes:
>
> > The model.weights() and model.offset() functions from the 'stats'
> > package index possibly-missing elements of a data frame via $, e.g.
>
> >
Many thanks Martin!
I was completely overlooking the behaviour for a length 1 vector with
00:00:00. More coffee needed for me I think.
Best
Tim
On 15/08/2023 08:58, Martin Maechler wrote:
Tim Taylor
on Mon, 14 Aug 2023 12:26:51 +0100 writes:
> Martin,
> Tha
Martin,
Thank you. Everything you have written is helpful and I admit I am likely
guilty of using as.character() instead of format() in the past().
Ignoring the above though, one thing I’m still unclear on is the special
handling of zero (or rather non-zero time) seconds in the method. Is the
I note in r-devel the hash table functionality is still marked as
experimental. Is it expected that this will progress to non-experimental
in 4.3 or is there a need for more feedback from the wider community first?
Tim
__
R-devel@r-project.org
On 17/01/2023 13:06, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
I don't have a valgrind-capable version of R, but I'd be interested to
see whether this is a one-time loss, or repeated. That is, do you get a
much bigger loss from running the lossy code in a loop like this?
for (i in 1:100) {
The link to the R blog on https://developer.r-project.org/ currently points to
the old site (https://developer.r-project.org/Blog/public). Should the link be
updated to the new location (https://blog.r-project.org/)?
Apologies if this was the wrong list to raise this - please flag if there's a
A tiny nit-pick nit-pick: I'd take NA to mean the finish date is missing
and you know neither whether the event has finished or if it has
finished at all :-)
Either way the proposed method seems sensible.
Tim
On 28/04/2023 16:29, Paul McQuesten wrote:
A tiny nit-pick: Seems to me that end
Please find attached a small patch to improve the performance of
as.matrix.dist(). It's a tiny bit more involved than the current code
but does bring a reasonable speed improvement for larger objects
(remaining comparable for smaller ones).
Example:
set.seed(1)
dat <- matrix(rnorm(2),
g 2023 22:38:44 +0100
> Tim Taylor пишет:
>
>> Submitting here in the first instance but happy to move to Bugzilla
>> if more appropriate.
>
> It's a fine patch. The 1.7 times speed up from not transposing the
> return value shouldn't be sneezed at. I think it's time
I wanted to raise the possibility of improving strcapture performance in
cases where perl = TRUE. I believe we can do this in a non-breaking way
by calling regexpr instead of regexec (conditionally when perl = TRUE).
To illustrate this I've put together a 'proof of concept' function called
The news feeds (e.g.
https://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-devel/NEWS) have some
stray "\abbr" floating around. Do they need generating with a more
recent version of R-devel?
I've run tools::Rd2txt on https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/doc/NEWS.Rd
and r85550 does seem to remove these
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024, at 11:32 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>> Gábor Csárdi
>> on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 11:55:36 +0200 writes:
>
> > I don't know if this is a bug, but it is certainly weird. AFAICT R
> > 4.4.0 has Matrix 1.7-0.
>
> Yes, it *is* available from CRAN: You can see it
I've made an example at https://github.com/tjtnew/newbies that uses
GitHub actions to monitor how many hours a package has been in the
"newbies" queue. It updates hourly and saves to a csv in the repo.
It's not something I have time to develop more but if someone wants to
pick it up and take it
Morning all
What's the best way to narrow down test errors that are occurring on
win-builder only? I've tried checking the package on local installs
of r-devel (both 32 bit and 64bit), and on the Windows installs on
rhub and through GitHub actions. On all of these systems the checks
pass
)
**
Cheers
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 10:02, Uwe Ligges
wrote:
>
> WHich package? Where are the logs?
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
>
> On 10.12.2020 10:39, Tim Taylor wrote:
> > Morning all
> >
> > What
No direct experience, so others may know more, but I'd have thought in the
system requirements of DESCRIPTION. See for instance what duckdb does
https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/blob/master/tools/rpkg/DESCRIPTION
From: R-package-devel on behalf of Reed
Could you have been caught out with the precompiled binary that serde started
distributing in a few of it’s versions
(https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2538)? That could have been a reason
if you pinned a version with it present but only CRAN could confirm if that was
the reason.
Tim
I’m definitely sympathetic to both sides but have come around to the view of
Greg, Dirk et al. It seems sensible to have a default that benefits the
majority of “normal” users and require explicit action in shared environments
not vice-versa.
That is not to say that data.table could not do
names(value) <- deparse1(substitute(x))
value
}
Kind regards
Enrico
Vincent
On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 at 10:41, Tim Taylor
wrote:
Apologies - I've not had enough caffeine just yet. The reprex below
highlights the issue but I think the code which implemented the change
*may* ne
Apologies - I've not had enough caffeine just yet. The reprex below
highlights the issue but I think the code which implemented the change
*may* need tweaking not lapply.
Tim
On 06/07/2023 09:26, Tim Taylor wrote:
This *may* be an issue in lapply. Let's see what others day. Reprex
below
This *may* be an issue in lapply. Let's see what others day. Reprex below
Sys.setenv("_R_CHECK_AS_DATA_FRAME_EXPLICIT_METHOD_" = TRUE)
dat <- Sys.Date()
as.data.frame(dat)
#> dat
#> 1 2023-07-06
lapply(dat, as.data.frame)
#> Warning: Direct call of 'as.data.frame.Date()' is deprecated.
On 12/05/2023 08:47, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
El vie., 12 may. 2023 5:58, Simon Urbanek
escribió:
I think it would be quite useful to have some community repository of code
snippets dealing with such situations. R-exts gives advice and pieces of
code which are useful, but they are not complete
This is just a punt from a quick glance at your tests. Try using the following
on your local build to ensure it's not a time zone issue
`TZ=NZ R CMD check --as-cran`
`Apologies if this is just noise but whenever I've had issues with datetimes
and mac tests this is the first thing I check.`
Hi Mikael
Revisiting this. Have the plans changed for 1.7-0 release?
Tim
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024, at 6:36 PM, Mikael Jagan wrote:
> Dear users and binary repository maintainers,
>
> We are preparing Matrix version 1.7-0 for CRAN submission on March 11, ahead
> of the spring release of R version
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024, at 11:52 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>>>>>> Tim Taylor
>>>>>> on Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:37:00 +0100 writes:
>
> > Hi Mikael Revisiting this. Have the plans changed for
> > 1.7-0 release?
>
> > Tim
&g
Does this issue over in knitr shed some additional light ...
https://github.com/yihui/knitr/issues/2338
Tim
On 07/06/2024 14:50, Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel wrote:
В Fri, 7 Jun 2024 09:10:03 +0200
"C.H." пишет:
RMarkdown vignettes are sometimes used to demonstrate errors and one
can
28 matches
Mail list logo
