> Ben Bolker
> on Fri, 13 Apr 2018 14:42:10 -0400 writes:
> Any follow-up/comments on this? If I don't hear back I'll submit to
> r-bugs so it doesn't get lost ...
> (Don't see any changes in QC.R in the last few days ...
> https://github.com/wch/r-source/commits/trunk/src/library/tools/R/QC.R
> )
Thank you, Ben, for the proposal and the reminder.
I agree that the message after the change is much easier to
understand, notably for people like me who are not proficient in
style of the Queen's English.
I've committed a change (74593) to R-devel where I've slightly
simplified the wording from
"this would be:" to
"that is:"
and really I cannot give a rational reason why I also
changed "this" to "that" so I'm open for another tweak from
people with better English style proficiency..
Martin
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ben Bolker
Date: Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 1:45 PM
Subject: suggested patch for messages
To: r-devel@r-project.org
Does anyone have comments on the new wording here?
Suggested:
The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:
(xxx)
In title case this would be:
(Xxx)
Hoping R core will see this here and magically adopt it, otherwise
I'll try posting it to the r bugs site ...
===
--- src/library/tools/R/QC.R(revision 74551)
+++ src/library/tools/R/QC.R(working copy)
@@ -7727,8 +7727,10 @@
"The Title field starts with the package name."
},
if(length(y <- x$title_case)) {
-paste(c("The Title field should be in title case,
current version then in title case:",
-sQuote(y)),
+paste(c("The Title field should be in title case.
Current version is:",
+sQuote(y[1]),
+"In title case this would be:",
+sQuote(y[2])),
collapse = "\n")
})),
fmt(c(if(length(x$descr_bad_initial)) {
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel