It is the problem of norm distribution. You know that 0 and 1are
coresponding to -inf and inf by qnorm function, which is no physical
meaning. That is why NA occured in sensitivity index. The author
recommended either using truncated norm distribution or tricky number of
sampling to avoid the 0
On 08.06.2013 00:54, Marino David wrote:
Dear all mailing listers,
Does Anyone have the same problem as mine when using the fast99
(extended-FAST method) to perform SA of model with norm distribution inputs?
Why not ask the authors of the function?
Best,
Uwe Ligges
See the simple
The author has already gave the illustration and solution as well.
Thanks.
2013/6/9 Uwe Ligges lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de
On 08.06.2013 00:54, Marino David wrote:
Dear all mailing listers,
Does Anyone have the same problem as mine when using the fast99
(extended-FAST method) to
On Jun 9, 2013, at 4:08 PM, Marino David wrote:
The author has already gave the illustration and solution as well.
Is that supposed to mean that you emailed the author and got a private response?
Thanks.
2013/6/9 Uwe Ligges lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de
On 08.06.2013 00:54,
Dear all mailing listers,
Does Anyone have the same problem as mine when using the fast99
(extended-FAST method) to perform SA of model with norm distribution inputs?
See the simple example given following.
Any suggestion will be greatly appreciated.
Thank you!
Marino
# Simple example
# 1.
5 matches
Mail list logo
