Re: [R] packaging an R-application

It sounds like it could be the sort of issue that Docker/Rocker is trying to address. Someone called Dirk might chime in on this. -pd > On 23 Dec 2015, at 22:29 , Witold E Wolski wrote: > > Dear List, > > > What I am seeking advice for is how to best package an R

Re: [R] packaging an R-application

On 23/12/2015 1:29 PM, Witold E Wolski wrote: Dear List, What I am seeking advice for is how to best package an R installation with all the packages required? Scenario: I need to deliver an R script which will have quite a bit of package dependencies, to packages which are not necessarily

Re: [R] packaging an R-application

This sounds like more of an operating system task than an R task. But within R, you can come close, I would think, by copying all of the packages' directories to the same directory as the script. Then write another script that will install all of the packages. In the future, run that script

[R] packaging an R-application

Dear List, What I am seeking advice for is how to best package an R installation with all the packages required? Scenario: I need to deliver an R script which will have quite a bit of package dependencies, to packages which are not necessarily stable, are not on cran and might dissapear in the

Re: [R] Packaging - Function with dots as argument

Hi again, I have chosen the solution reading the Rd file of xyplot.zoo function, in zoo package. Regards. Eva El Domingo 26 de enero de 2014 2:45, Eva Prieto Castro evapcas...@yahoo.es escribió: Hi everybody, I am writing the .Rd files of my pckage, and I have a doubt in relation

Re: [R] Packaging - Function with dots as argument

Hello, You can put that in the Details section, something like \arguments{ \item{\dots}{several arguments to pass to another function, see Details} } and then document the arguments a and b in the Details section. Hope this helps, Rui Barradas Em 26-01-2014 01:45, Eva Prieto Castro

[R] Packaging - Function with dots as argument

Hi everybody, I am writing the .Rd files of my pckage, and I have a doubt in relation with the Rd file of a function that has dots as unique argument. I mean the following: g - function(a,b) a + b f - function( ... ) g(...) Imagine I have the Rd file of f function. The usage is as follows:

Re: [R] Packaging: Doubt in relation with R CMD Rd2pdf packagename

Thanks Rich. I used your indications, but it was correctly in PATH variable. My path is C:\Program Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.9\miktex\bin. I send you a print. Do you have any other idea?. Thanks again. Eva El Lunes 6 de enero de 2014 23:36, Eva Prieto Castro evapcas...@yahoo.es escribió:

Re: [R] Packaging: Doubt in relation with R CMD Rd2pdf packagename

The image suggests that you are missing a font. Someone else might be able to help with that. On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Eva Prieto Castro evapcas...@yahoo.es wrote: Thanks Rich. I used your indications, but it was correctly in PATH variable. My path is C:\Program Files (x86)\MiKTeX

Re: [R] Packaging: Doubt in relation with R CMD Rd2pdf packagename

Hi again: Rich, I see your messages but they are sent to another mail address so I have to write from here without using your answer. I think the problem is that inconsolata.sty is not found, and zi4.sty is not found. I have read several documents in www about this question but I can not

Re: [R] Packaging: Doubt in relation with R CMD Rd2pdf packagename

Hi Rich, Hi everybody I have solved the problem!. I installed MikTeX 2.9 again, but this time I chose basic installation (the other one I had chosen complete installation). I noticed a diference if we compare with the previous situation: now R and MikTeX are installed in the same folder

Re: [R] Packaging: Doubt in relation with R CMD Rd2pdf packagename

On 14-01-07 3:35 PM, Eva Prieto Castro wrote: Hi Rich, Hi everybody I have solved the problem!. I installed MikTeX 2.9 again, but this time I chose basic installation (the other one I had chosen complete installation). I noticed a diference if we compare with the previous situation: now R and

[R] Packaging: Doubt in relation with R CMD Rd2pdf packagename

Hi everybody, I have created a package without documentation and now I want to create it with a pdf manual. That is the reason why I have created the .Rd files in man folder. In this way I obtain a pdf manual usind R CMD check packagename, but it ignores the \code{\link{function.name}}... I

Re: [R] Packaging: Doubt in relation with R CMD Rd2pdf packagename

This looks like a PATH problem. Most likely Miktex isn't where you told R to find it. FInd out where miktex is by typing pdflatex in the Start button search box. Right click on it when it appears and then click properties. The properties window has a Location field. The value in the location

Re: [R] Packaging

At 08:13 30/08/2013, Eva Prieto Castro wrote: Hi, I have a problem when I try to generate the Documentation pdf (from .rda files)in Spanish during the package creation. Could you tell me the way I can do it?. Eva It would be usual to have the documentation in a file of type .Rd not .rda

Re: [R] Packaging

On 08/30/2013 05:13 PM, Eva Prieto Castro wrote: Hi, I have a problem when I try to generate the Documentation pdf (from .rda files)in Spanish during the package creation. Could you tell me the way I can do it?. Thanks in advance. Hi Eva, Without knowing what the error is, it is very

[R] Packaging

Hi, I have a problem when I try to generate the Documentation pdf (from .rda files)in Spanish during the package creation. Could you tell me the way I can do it?. Thanks in advance. Regards. Eva [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __

Re: [R] Packaging Error

. The point is the package compiles normally, if I set ByteCompile to FALSE. Could this be some bug in R or my fault? -Original Message- From: Uwe Ligges [mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 7:27 PM To: Mayank Bansal Cc: r-help@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R

Re: [R] Packaging Error

. -Original Message- From: Uwe Ligges [mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 7:27 PM To: Mayank Bansal Cc: r-help@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] Packaging Error On 26.06.2012 08:54, Mayank Bansal wrote: I was trying to ByteCompile a package that I made

[R] Packaging Error

I was trying to ByteCompile a package that I made. The package compiles successfully with byte compile set to FALSE. When I set ByteCompile to TRUE, I receive the following error message while doing R CMD INSTALL /usr/lib/R/bin/INSTALL: line 34: 9964 Done echo 'tools:::.install_packages()'

Re: [R] Packaging Error

On 26.06.2012 08:54, Mayank Bansal wrote: I was trying to ByteCompile a package that I made. The package compiles successfully with byte compile set to FALSE. When I set ByteCompile to TRUE, I receive the following error message while doing R CMD INSTALL /usr/lib/R/bin/INSTALL: line 34:

Re: [R] packaging my function

Thanks! That worked perfectly. Mipam 2010/10/7 Duncan Murdoch murdoch.dun...@gmail.com On 07/10/2010 10:06 AM, Mipam Bruining wrote: Dear all, I write to you because there seems to be something I'm just not 'getting' in the way R lets you construct a new package. Google and this

[R] packaging my function

Dear all, I write to you because there seems to be something I'm just not 'getting' in the way R lets you construct a new package. Google and this mailing list's archive don't seem to have the answer to my specific case so I signed up and mailed the question myself. So I've written this function

Re: [R] packaging my function

On 07/10/2010 10:06 AM, Mipam Bruining wrote: Dear all, I write to you because there seems to be something I'm just not 'getting' in the way R lets you construct a new package. Google and this mailing list's archive don't seem to have the answer to my specific case so I signed up and mailed

Re: [R] packaging R

I can license the application under GPL On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Duncan Murdoch murd...@stats.uwo.cawrote: On 14/10/2009 6:35 PM, H Rao wrote: Hi, I am planning to use R as the backend in my application and VB as the front end. I want to be able to distribute it as a stand alone

Re: [R] packaging R

On 15/10/2009 7:00 AM, H Rao wrote: I can license the application under GPL On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Duncan Murdoch murd...@stats.uwo.ca mailto:murd...@stats.uwo.ca wrote: On 14/10/2009 6:35 PM, H Rao wrote: Hi, I am planning to use R as the backend in my

[R] packaging R

Hi, I am planning to use R as the backend in my application and VB as the front end. I want to be able to distribute it as a stand alone application and my users should not have to install R separately to use the application. I want to be able to integrate the R interpreter into the application

Re: [R] packaging R

On 14/10/2009 6:35 PM, H Rao wrote: Hi, I am planning to use R as the backend in my application and VB as the front end. I want to be able to distribute it as a stand alone application and my users should not have to install R separately to use the application. I want to be able to integrate

[R] R packaging

can be checked. Ideas, anyone Regards, Grant -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/R-packaging-tp17664450p17664450.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch

Re: [R] R packaging

Soil inf. wrote: I have followed the instructions of numerous references in trying to package my own functions. It appears as though i have all my paths and programs aligned but i get the following error message when i R CMD CHECK my package: *checking if this is a source bundle.ERROR