Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-11 Thread Marc Schwartz
on 01/10/2009 01:50 PM Kingsford Jones wrote: The reactions to the NYT article have certainly made for some interesting reading. Here are some of the links: http://overdetermined.net/site/content/new-york-times-article-r http://jackman.stanford.edu/blog/?p=1053

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-10 Thread Tony Breyal
“We have customers who build engines for aircraft. I am happy they are not using freeware when I get on a jet.” The lady who made this comment, Anne H. Milley, director of technology product marketing at SAS, has written a response to try and clarify what she meant (funilly enough, i got this

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-10 Thread Florian Lengyel
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Tony Breyal tony.bre...@googlemail.com wrote: We have customers who build engines for aircraft. I am happy they are not using freeware when I get on a jet. The lady who made this comment, Anne H. Milley, director of technology product marketing at SAS, has

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-10 Thread Barry Rowlingson
2009/1/10 Tony Breyal tony.bre...@googlemail.com: [SAS marketroid quote] In fact, SAS values open-source software. But clearly not enough to open-source SAS itself. It would seem that SAS values _other_people's_ open source. If SAS was open source and free, then SAS would collect on all the

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-10 Thread Ajay ohri
more on the reasons R is bad for you http://www.decisionstats.com/2009/01/top-ten-rrreasons-r-is-bad-for-you/ On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Barry Rowlingson b.rowling...@lancaster.ac.uk wrote: 2009/1/10 Tony Breyal tony.bre...@googlemail.com: [SAS marketroid quote] In fact, SAS

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-10 Thread Bert Gunter
. Cheers to all, Bert Gunter -Original Message- From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Barry Rowlingson Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 10:32 AM To: Tony Breyal Cc: r-help@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] R in the NY Times 2009/1/10 Tony

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-10 Thread Kingsford Jones
The reactions to the NYT article have certainly made for some interesting reading. Here are some of the links: http://overdetermined.net/site/content/new-york-times-article-r http://jackman.stanford.edu/blog/?p=1053 http://ggorjan.blogspot.com/2009/01/new-york-times-on-r.html several posts on

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-10 Thread Johannes Huesing
Bert Gunter gunter.ber...@gene.com [Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 08:31:03PM CET]: [...] Perhaps an argument is that certain code might not get written at all if it were not proprietary. Device drivers might be an example. Device drivers are not an example. Linux is ubiquitous _despite_ device

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-10 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
- From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Barry Rowlingson Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 10:32 AM To: Tony Breyal Cc: r-help@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] R in the NY Times 2009/1/10 Tony Breyal tony.bre...@googlemail.com: [SAS marketroid quote

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-08 Thread Marc Schwartz
on 01/07/2009 09:47 PM Gabor Grothendieck wrote: On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org wrote: On 7 January 2009 at 18:24, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: | By running the code below we see that the: | - sum of the three seems to be rising at a constant rate | - S is

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-08 Thread Max Kuhn
More commentary on Slashdot: http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/07/2316227 __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-08 Thread Doran, Harold
Subject: Re: [R] R in the NY Times More commentary on Slashdot: http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/07/2316227 __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-08 Thread Stas Kolenikov
On 1/7/09, Gabor Grothendieck ggrothendi...@gmail.com wrote: Here is the same number of messages/posts data for each of S, SAS, R: - reworked into a 3 column ts class time series - with Jan 2009 removed since its not complete - leading and trailing NA rows removed My software of choice

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-08 Thread Louis Bajuk-Yorgan
: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 12:58 PM To: marc_schwa...@comcast.net Cc: r-help@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] R in the NY Times On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Marc Schwartz marc_schwa...@comcast.net wrote: on 01/07/2009 08:44 AM Kevin E. Thorpe wrote: Zaslavsky, Alan M. wrote: This article

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-08 Thread Carlos J. Gil Bellosta
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:42 -0600, Stas Kolenikov wrote: A really good measure for R will be the total # of the downloads of r-base for all platforms from all CRAN mirrors (and I would expect that # can be found from the servers' logs). Hello, You obviate here that many of us are downloading

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-08 Thread ohri2007
-Original Message- From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Douglas Bates Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 12:58 PM To: marc_schwa...@comcast.net Cc: r-help@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] R in the NY Times On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Marc

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-08 Thread Rahul-A.Agarwal
-project.org Subject: Re: [R] R in the NY Times Yes I think R as a package can really learn from SAS and SPSS in making GUI more user friendly , even at the risk of dumbing down some complexity.. also as a consultant I know that selling software requires a lot of marketing follow ups..which is why R

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-08 Thread Marc Schwartz
on 01/08/2009 01:12 PM Andrew Choens wrote: On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:42 -0600, Stas Kolenikov wrote: A really good measure for R will be the total # of the downloads of r-base for all platforms from all CRAN mirrors (and I would expect that # can be found from the servers' logs). Given that it

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-08 Thread Carlos J. Gil Bellosta
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 13:52 -0600, Marc Schwartz wrote: Reading the posts on SAS-L since yesterday via Google RSS, where the NYT article was also posted, some have noted that SAS itself offers online support forums (http://support.sas.com/forums/index.jspa). From a quick review, it looks

[R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Zaslavsky, Alan M.
This article is accompanied by nice pictures of Robert and Ross. Data Analysts Captivated by Power of R http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/07/technology/business-computing/07program.html January 7, 2009 Data Analysts Captivated by R’s Power By ASHLEE VANCE To some people R is just the 18th letter

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Bill Pikounis
Pardon my exuberance, but this is simply awesome. What a treat to find on the front web page of the NY Times this morning under Technology. I think the article is very well written by the author, and I think it captures top highlights of why the software and community are so special. Continued

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Frank E Harrell Jr
This is great to see. It's interesting that SAS Institute feels that non-peer-reviewed software with hidden implementations of analytic methods that cannot be reproduced by others should be trusted when building aircraft engines. Frank Zaslavsky, Alan M. wrote: This article is accompanied

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Frank E Harrell Jr
Bill Pikounis wrote: Pardon my exuberance, but this is simply awesome. What a treat to find on the front web page of the NY Times this morning under Technology. I think the article is very well written by the author, and I think it captures top highlights of why the software and community are so

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Simon Pickett
...@gmail.com Cc: r-help@r-project.org Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 2:25 PM Subject: Re: [R] R in the NY Times Bill Pikounis wrote: Pardon my exuberance, but this is simply awesome. What a treat to find on the front web page of the NY Times this morning under Technology. I think the article

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Kevin E. Thorpe
Zaslavsky, Alan M. wrote: This article is accompanied by nice pictures of Robert and Ross. Data Analysts Captivated by Power of R http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/07/technology/business-computing/07program.html January 7, 2009 Data Analysts Captivated by R’s Power By ASHLEE VANCE SAS says

[R] R in the NY Times-IAsians perspective

2009-01-07 Thread Ajay ohri
. - Original Message - From: Frank E Harrell Jr f.harr...@vanderbilt.edu To: Bill Pikounis billpikou...@gmail.com Cc: r-help@r-project.org Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 2:25 PM Subject: Re: [R] R in the NY Times Bill Pikounis wrote: Pardon my exuberance, but this is simply awesome

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Marc Schwartz
on 01/07/2009 08:44 AM Kevin E. Thorpe wrote: Zaslavsky, Alan M. wrote: This article is accompanied by nice pictures of Robert and Ross. Data Analysts Captivated by Power of R http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/07/technology/business-computing/07program.html January 7, 2009 Data Analysts

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Tony Breyal
Thank you for posting this, I found it a very enjoyable read! I am curious, is there an archive of 'R in the Media' or 'R in the Press' articles somewhere? It would be interesting to see how the perception of R has changed/evolved over time relative to other packages. Cheers, Tony Breyal On 7

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Rubén Roa-Ureta
Zaslavsky, Alan M. wrote: This article is accompanied by nice pictures of Robert and Ross. Data Analysts Captivated by Power of R http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/07/technology/business-computing/07program.html Thanks for the heads up. The R morale is going through the roof! I've given

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Jeffrey J. Hallman
The article quotes John Chambers, but it doesn't mention that R started out as an implementation of the S language. I don't suppose Insightful is too happy about that. The SAS spokesman quoted in the article is clearly whistling past the graveyard. -- Jeff

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Darin A. England
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 08:00:28AM -0600, Frank E Harrell Jr wrote: This is great to see. It's interesting that SAS Institute feels that non-peer-reviewed software with hidden implementations of analytic methods that cannot be reproduced by others should be trusted when building aircraft

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 1/7/2009 9:44 AM, Kevin E. Thorpe wrote: Zaslavsky, Alan M. wrote: This article is accompanied by nice pictures of Robert and Ross. Data Analysts Captivated by Power of R http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/07/technology/business-computing/07program.html January 7, 2009 Data Analysts

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Jeffrey J. Hallman wrote: The article quotes John Chambers, but it doesn't mention that R started out as an implementation of the S language. I don't suppose Insightful is too happy about that. You mean Tibco... The statement that S failed to generate broad interest is also a bit misleading.

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Max Kuhn
You can look on the SAS message boards and see there is a proportional downturn in traffic. I think that I actually made this statement about both the SAS and Splus traffic... I wasn't really trying to be critical of SAS. I was trying to get across that SAS focused their resources on features

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread David M Smith
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Tony Breyal tony.bre...@googlemail.com wrote: Thank you for posting this, I found it a very enjoyable read! I am curious, is there an archive of 'R in the Media' or 'R in the Press' articles somewhere? It would be interesting to see how the perception of R has

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Bryan Hanson
I believe the SAS person shot themselves in the foot more in more ways than one. In my mind, the reason you would pay, as Frank said, for non-peer-reviewed software with hidden implementations of analytic methods that cannot be reproduced by others Would be so that you can sue them later

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Marc Schwartz
I would also point out that the use of the term freeware as opposed to FOSS by the SAS rep, comes off as being unprofessional and deliberately condescending... The author of the article, to his credit, was pretty consistent in using open source terminology. Regards, Marc on 01/07/2009 10:26 AM

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Andrew Choens
Unfortunately, that type of FUD issued by the SAS marketing person still works. I see it at my employer (a large healthcare company.) It's a battle to change a culture, but ironically the recession helps. People are now taking notice of the obscene licensing fees for SAS. Darin I agree. I

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Ajay ohri
you can use google alerts to track media coverage of R using some keywords regards, ajay On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:52 PM, David M Smith da...@revolution-computing.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Tony Breyal tony.bre...@googlemail.com wrote: Thank you for posting this, I found

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Ted Harding
On 07-Jan-09 18:03:19, Erik Iverson wrote: I pointed a friend of mine toward the article, to which he replied: I hope that they run SAS on Solaris too, god only knows how tainted the syscalls are in that linux freeware. Of course, now Solaris is 'freeware', too, so I suppose that

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Barry Rowlingson
2009/1/7 Darin A. England engl...@cs.umn.edu: Unfortunately, that type of FUD issued by the SAS marketing person still works. I see it at my employer (a large healthcare company.) I see it here, at a university. Quote: We couldn't possibly do our analysis using some software we've just

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Tony Breyal
Google Alerts are great, but unfortuantly the brevity of R's name is the main problem i think. though, thinking about it, i suppose if one could work out the 'best' key words to use, it might be possible to not get too many miss- classified results, e.g.,

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Wacek Kusnierczyk
Kevin E. Thorpe wrote: Zaslavsky, Alan M. wrote: SAS says it has noticed R’s rising popularity at universities, despite educational discounts on its own software, but it dismisses the technology as being of interest to a limited set of people working on very hard tasks. “I think it

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Marc Schwartz
on 01/07/2009 09:29 AM Max Kuhn wrote: You can look on the SAS message boards and see there is a proportional downturn in traffic. I think that I actually made this statement about both the SAS and Splus traffic... I wasn't really trying to be critical of SAS. I was trying to get across

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Spencer Graves
What kind of warranty does SAS offer? I haven't read their EULA recently, but if an airplane fell out of the sky because of a bug in SAS code, I'd be surprised if SAS was eager to pay damages! Spencer Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote: Kevin E. Thorpe wrote: Zaslavsky, Alan M. wrote: SAS

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 1/7/2009 3:03 PM, Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote: Kevin E. Thorpe wrote: Zaslavsky, Alan M. wrote: SAS says it has noticed R’s rising popularity at universities, despite educational discounts on its own software, but it dismisses the technology as being of interest to a limited set of people

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Mitchell Maltenfort
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Spencer Graves spencer.gra...@pdf.com wrote: What kind of warranty does SAS offer? I haven't read their EULA recently, but if an airplane fell out of the sky because of a bug in SAS code, I'd be surprised if SAS was eager to pay damages! Spencer And that's

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Thomas Adams
Wacek, One would hope that if someone were to use software to build engines for aircraft, that said person would sufficiently test the software to have confidence in it, whether it had a Warranty or not — at least that's my mode of operation… Cheers! Tom Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote: Kevin E.

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Erik Iverson
I pointed a friend of mine toward the article, to which he replied: I hope that they run SAS on Solaris too, god only knows how tainted the syscalls are in that linux freeware. Of course, now Solaris is 'freeware', too, so I suppose that according to SAS, running SAS on Windows is the best way

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
Here is the same number of messages/posts data for each of S, SAS, R: - reworked into a 3 column ts class time series - with Jan 2009 removed since its not complete - leading and trailing NA rows removed At end we plot the raw data as well as the time series of totals and show loess smooths for

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread hadley wickham
Here's a couple of similar plots created with ggplot2. I chose to turn the data into a data frame with an explicit date column. Using a log scale somewhat stabilises the variability. ## SAS-L traffic sas - structure(list(Jan = c(NA, 546L, 548L, 853L, 1007L, 894L, 514L, 1720L, 1826L, 1941L,

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
I did try the log version as well prior to posting but although it would seem to exaggerate the difference to me the insights from plotting the raw data with loess (i.e. constancy of the total, piecewise constant growth of R) come through best. On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Spencer Graves

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Marc Schwartz
Here's a couple of similar plots created with ggplot2. I chose to turn the data into a data frame with an explicit date column. Using a log scale somewhat stabilises the variability. ## SAS-L traffic sas - structure(list(Jan = c(NA, 546L, 548L, 853L, 1007L, 894L, 514L, 1720L, 1826L,

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread hadley wickham
You might want to remove the 2009 data from each of the three lists given that the January data is not yet complete. The result of including the January 2009 data in your plots is that the growth trajectory for the smoothed curves for SAS-L and R-Help appear to be leveling or even declining,

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
Note that the mts object I posted already had Jan 2009 removed and also had the NA rows removed. On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:58 PM, hadley wickham h.wick...@gmail.com wrote: You might want to remove the 2009 data from each of the three lists given that the January data is not yet complete. The

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 7 January 2009 at 18:24, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: | By running the code below we see that the: | - sum of the three seems to be rising at a constant rate | - S is declining | - SAS and R are rising | - R is rising the fastest through its completed its phase | of highest growth which ended

Re: [R] R in the NY Times

2009-01-07 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org wrote: On 7 January 2009 at 18:24, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: | By running the code below we see that the: | - sum of the three seems to be rising at a constant rate | - S is declining | - SAS and R are rising | - R is rising