Then lets go with this:
http://pastebin.com/6dtGCrpA
as an example of what i do. If you've got a better idea lets hear it :)
On 29.06.2012, at 17:30, Joshua Wiley wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Jessica Streicher
j.streic...@micromata.de wrote:
Hm.. i attached a file with the code,
Well, i built the methods to create a bit of latex and plot to pdf files for
figures, especially figures with subfloats, which weren't possible with sweave
(at least i didn't find a way). So i only have to make the calls, give them to
the method, and will get proper latex, and the plots will be
On 29.06.2012, at 10:05, Jessica Streicher wrote:
Well, i built the methods to create a bit of latex and plot to pdf files for
figures, especially figures with subfloats, which weren't possible with
sweave (at least i didn't find a way). So i only have to make the calls, give
them to the
Hm.. i attached a file with the code, but it doesn't show up somehow..
On 29.06.2012, at 10:13, Jessica Streicher wrote:
On 29.06.2012, at 10:05, Jessica Streicher wrote:
Well, i built the methods to create a bit of latex and plot to pdf files for
figures, especially figures with
Hi!
I am getting a lot of numbers in the background of the pca screeplots if i use
call(plot) and eval(somecall).
Til now, creating the calls and plotting later on this way worked fine. Example:
pcaI-prcomp(iris[,1:4])
plot(pcaI)
x-call(plot,pcaI)
eval(x)
Anyone got an idea how i can
Hi Jessica,
x - call(plot, quote(pcaI))
eval(x)
that said, I suspect you would be better off avoiding this idiom
altogether. Storing unevaluated calls is akin to putting tomatoes on
your sandwich before packing it for work---you can do it but you end
up with a soggy sandwich by the time you are
Thanks Josh,
that soggy sandwhich saves me a LOT of code by the way,
I'll keep it for the time being ;)
greetings
Jessica
On 28.06.2012, at 17:15, Joshua Wiley wrote:
Hi Jessica,
x - call(plot, quote(pcaI))
eval(x)
that said, I suspect you would be better off avoiding this idiom
Yes. One usually creates a call object when one need to modify it in some
way -- e.g. alter arguments, change the function -- prior to evaluation.
That doesn't seem to be the case here.
Why isn't plot(pcal) acceptable?
?do.call
is also a more straightforward way to create and evaluate a call
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Jessica Streicher
j.streic...@micromata.de wrote:
Thanks Josh,
that soggy sandwhich saves me a LOT of code by the way,
I'll keep it for the time being ;)
There may be other ways. With no knowledge of your context, obviously
I cannot say absolutely that
9 matches
Mail list logo
