Re: [R-pkg-devel] package submissions no auto-processed message

I got it. Thanks Uwe. On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 4:05 PM Uwe Ligges wrote: > Thanks.This was pending a manual inspection for newbies (packages). > ALthough, we also have no mail with test results (I guess a CRAN > server's mail issue when this hot checked), so I just triggered new checks. > >

Re: [R-pkg-devel] [Rd] R packages to send plottable data to external apps

I think r-package-devel is a better place for this. CC'ing there. On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 at 23:50, Mike Marchywka wrote: > > I was curious what R packages, or indeed any other applications, exist > to plot streamed data from arbitrary data generators. It need not > be publication quality plotting

Re: [R-pkg-devel] package submissions no auto-processed message

Oh I'm sorry. It's the ruminate package. On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 2:22 PM Uwe Ligges wrote: > > > On 27.08.2023 22:51, John Harrold wrote: > > Howdy Folks, > > > > I submitted a package on Friday. I got the normal email where you have to > > click on the link to confirm. Then I got an email

Re: [R-pkg-devel] package submissions no auto-processed message

Thanks.This was pending a manual inspection for newbies (packages). ALthough, we also have no mail with test results (I guess a CRAN server's mail issue when this hot checked), so I just triggered new checks. Best, Uwe Ligges On 28.08.2023 00:37, John Harrold wrote: Oh I'm sorry. It's the

Re: [R-pkg-devel] package submissions no auto-processed message

Hi, Are you referring to your package formods? I see it was released the same Friday 17 and it is already on CRAN. If this is not the package, it might be on the backlog of packages submitted to CRAN. You can check the queue at: https://r-hub.github.io/cransays/articles/dashboard.html Best,

Re: [R-pkg-devel] package submissions no auto-processed message

On 27.08.2023 22:51, John Harrold wrote: Howdy Folks, I submitted a package on Friday. I got the normal email where you have to click on the link to confirm. Then I got an email saying that the package was uploaded. Normally after that I get an email saying the package was auto-processed.

[R-pkg-devel] package submissions no auto-processed message

Howdy Folks, I submitted a package on Friday. I got the normal email where you have to click on the link to confirm. Then I got an email saying that the package was uploaded. Normally after that I get an email saying the package was auto-processed. That generally doesn't take very long (typically

Re: [R-pkg-devel] What to do when a package is archived from CRAN

Hi Tim, thank you for sharing this information. i didn't know this. If this is the cause, the problem seems to have been resolved in the latest serde , so it seems to be possible to deal with it. Best, Tatsuya On 2023/08/27 20:24, Tim Taylor

Re: [R-pkg-devel] What to do when a package is archived from CRAN

Hi Ivan, thanks for taking the time to look at all the details of this. > You licensed the package as MIT. Are your dependencies compatible with MIT? All direct dependencies of your Rust code seem to be licensed under either MIT or Apache-2.0, which seems to be compatible. I am not a legal

Re: [R-pkg-devel] What to do when a package is archived from CRAN

Simon, Thank you for taking a look at this. > One related issue with respect to CRAN policies that I don't see a good solution for is that inst/AUTHORS is patently unhelpful, because most of them say "foo (version ..): foo authors" with no contact, or real names or any links. I understand

Re: [R-pkg-devel] What to do when a package is archived from CRAN

Sarah, Thanks for taking a look at this. But what we see in the results page is the compiled size, and I think it is common for it to be huge. For example, looking at the arrow package 12.0.1.1 >, the size of

Re: [R-pkg-devel] What to do when a package is archived from CRAN

Could you have been caught out with the precompiled binary that serde started distributing in a few of it’s versions (https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2538)? That could have been a reason if you pinned a version with it present but only CRAN could confirm if that was the reason. Tim