ggplot2, as well as rlang and glue
>
> -Roy
>
> > On May 28, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Iñaki Ucar
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 28 May 2019 at 20:12, Τόλης Χαλκής wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> we have submitted the package volesti to CRAN and
Dear all,
we have submitted the package volesti to CRAN and it is temporarily
accepted, because the check in solaris and
windows r-release-windows-ix86+x86_64 failed as you can see here
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_volesti.html
The check in solaris fails when the lpsolve
Dear all,
We have developed an R package written in C++ with Rcpp wrappers
https://github.com/GeomScale/volume_approximation
We use the C code from lpSolveAPI (
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lpSolveAPI/index.html). We have
added the code with no changes in folder ./src/lp_solve.
We
..@gmail.com> skrev:
>
> You can also "follow" your package submission on the CRAN FTP server:
>
> ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/
>
> /Henrik
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:26 PM Duncan Murdoch
> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/03/2019 2:57
submission on the CRAN FTP server:
> >
> > ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/
> >
> > /Henrik
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:26 PM Duncan Murdoch
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/03/2019 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote:
> >>> Dear all,
>
Dear all,
We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have not got
a
positive or a negative answer for the submission since then. Is this
normal? Is
there any way to get informed for the review process?
Best regards,
-Chalkis Apostolos
[[alternative HTML version
Dear Duncan,
Thank you very much for your email. That worked fine!
-Tolis.
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 15:41, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 18/02/2019 6:08 a.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote:
> > I am developing a Rcpp package in order to make a submission to CRAN. I
> use
> > modules for 4 C
I am developing a Rcpp package in order to make a submission to CRAN. I use
modules for 4 C++ classes. I have used the prompt function (`prompt(yada,
"yada-module.Rd")`) using the names of my modules, in order to document the
exposed classes. But I still get a warning when I perform the check
Dear all,
I am developing a R package using RcppEigen on Ubuntu 18.04. Since update
0.3.3.4.0 I get hundreds of warnings but if I add PKG_CXXFLAGS =
-Wno-ignored-attributes in Makevars the warnings disappear and the compile
time reduces a lot.
devtools::check() gives the warning below:
Dear all,
this period I am working as a student on a Google Summer of Code project.
We develop an Rcpp package.
I am trying to create a documentation as a pdf using roxygen2.
I add the comments #' above of each R function and generate the Rd files
with roxygwn2::roxygenise() function.
Then I run
Dear all,
this period i am working on a gsoc project. We develop a c++ library with a
R interface using Rcpp and we plan to submit it to CRAN. We use the default
Rcpp package structure in a folder /root/R-proj. The c++ headers files are
into a folder /root/include outside the R-proj folder. In
11 matches
Mail list logo
