Depending on your use case you can also take a look at the nanoarrow
package (https://cran.r-project.org/package=nanoarrow). Maybe it
provides all the features you need and has a much smaller footprint than
'arrow'.
Best,
Denes
On 2/22/24 10:01, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
If you look on the CRAN check results for arrow, you'll see it has
errors on the Linux platforms that use clang, and can't be installed there.
For you to deal with this, you should make arrow into a suggested
package, and if it is missing, work around that without generating an
error. Another choice would be to work with the arrow developers to get
it to install on the systems where it fails now, but it's a big package,
so that would likely be a lot harder.
Duncan Murdoch
On 21/02/2024 5:15 p.m., Park, Sung Jae wrote:
Hi,
I’m writing to seek assistance regarding an issue we’re encountering
during the submission process of our new package to CRAN.
The package in question is currently working smoothly on R CMD check
on Windows; however, we are facing a specific error when running R CMD
check on Debian. The error message we’ve got from CRAN is as follows:
```
❯ checking package dependencies ... ERROR
Package required but not available: ‘arrow’
See section ‘The DESCRIPTION file’ in the ‘Writing R Extensions’
manual.
```
We have ensured that the ‘arrow’ package is properly listed in
DESCRIPTION file under the ‘Imports:’.
Could you please provide guidance on how to resolve this? Any help
will be valuable.
Thank you in advance.
Best,
--Sungjae
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
