[R-pkg-devel] CRAN pretest archived because of 2 NOTEs

2018-04-18 Thread Gertjan van den Burg
/2018 10:01 PM, Iñaki Úcar wrote: 2018-04-18 22:49 GMT+02:00 Gertjan van den Burg <gertjanvandenb...@gmail.com>: Thanks for your comment. Your suggestion wouldn't solve my original problem unfortunately, because then I'd have to reverse engineer R's RNG for my Python package. Besides, the q

[R-pkg-devel] CRAN pretest archived because of 2 NOTEs

2018-04-18 Thread Gertjan van den Burg
. Gertjan On 04/18/2018 08:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 18 April 2018 at 11:36, Gertjan van den Burg wrote: | While waiting to get this message posted to the list, I've solved the | problem by copying the stdlib rand() and srand() functions into my | package under a different name. This makes

[R-pkg-devel] CRAN pretest archived because of 2 NOTEs

2018-04-18 Thread Gertjan van den Burg
explaining that these are false positives, but since I haven't heard back in 10 days I don't think anyone read that. Same thing for the submission comments (which also explained it). The first note is: * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE Maintainer: ‘Gertjan van den Burg <gertjanvand