Did you increment the version number?
On June 5, 2024 1:19:27 AM PDT, Paul Kabaila wrote:
>(1) Today, I submitted my R package to CRAN using
>devtools::submit_cran()
>which resulted in an email from
>CRAN Package Submission Form
Duncan's point about options is key... the build options set by default in
devtools etc are generally configured to minimize the time required to identify
the next big issue to address. Options appropriate for preparing to submit to
CRAN are slow and inconvenient for developing.
I recommend
so... your suggestion is not for CRAN, but for R-Core, who makes changes to
R
On May 18, 2024 6:03:55 PM PDT, "Richard M. Heiberger" wrote:
>exactly. when the --as-cran detects the need for that NOTE, it could prefix
>the initial instance of that NOTE with information about
>updating the
What is a "right side window"? Are you mixing up what R does and what RStudio
does? I think I agree with Ivan that this is a question about the environment
in which you are loading the package rather than anything in the package itself.
On March 7, 2024 11:21:06 AM PST, "Ruff, Sergej"
wrote:
Remove leading periods from all file names in the tar.gz. Use .Rbuildignore to
handle such files in your dev directory if you need them. Maybe also look at
[1].
[1]
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40950799/r-cmd-check-error-how-to-get-rid-of-hidden-files-and-directory-in-devel-r-pack
On
Are you aware of this [1]? J. Random Lurker may not be a reliable source, and
actual CRAN repo maintainers are probably a bit busy...
[1] https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/policies.html#Submission
On February 8, 2024 8:37:50 AM PST, Josiah Parry wrote:
>I intend to change the maintainer
Type conversions are always a bit risky... this one appears to be likely to
corrupt data. If they actually intended to truncate values like this then they
should have cast explicitly.
Looks like you need to report this to the SUNDIALS maintainers.
On February 3, 2024 7:38:35 AM PST,
This is a narrow view of the world. As has been mentioned here by Tomas, the
issue at this point is that a very widely-used operating system does not allow
the absolute path to be longer than 254 characters unless users make
possibly-breaking changes to their OS configuration. If a user is
Rhub is not CRAN. Please include a link to your source package if you want
help. If there is actually a bug in Rhub then this NUL error may not reflect
the response you will get from CRAN if and when you submit.
On December 13, 2023 12:58:41 AM PST, Friedemann von Lampe
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>when
Richard ... they are by different maintainers. They also are built with
completely different underlying technologies... creating a bitmap is easy,
deciphering one is difficult and may not be necessary in the same workflow and
there may be different compiled code available optimized for
A code chunk does always begin with a triple backtick at the beginning of a
line. The term for what you encountered is "inline code" used to embed computed
results into the markdown text as though you had typed them directly.
Check out
ROFL! Seconded!
The quote itself has a bit of greybeard smell to it, but the "ran out of stuff
to delete at 100GB with 1000 out of 6000 targets compiled" had me in stitches.
On October 31, 2023 10:16:10 AM PDT, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>On 31 October 2023 at 19:58, Ivan Krylov wrote:
>|
Installed packages may not be modified because they are permitted to be
installed with read-only access. You have no option to proceed in this
direction.
Configuration files are normally stored in the user's working directory.
Dotfiles are a common convention in *nix operating systems, but in
R could care less about what is in PATH... there is however a difference
between Windows parsing PATH and how CMD lets you quote things interactively.
The whole point of PATH is to let you or R provide simple program names like
qpdf without knowing where they are... Windows takes over and looks
This error arises because you are not declaring the function properly before
you call it... likely because you have not included the appropriate header file
or because you have typoed the function call.
If you provide a link to your package someone may point you more precisely to
your error,
You asked how order works. From the R source you can follow which C functions
are executed, and since you seem familiar with C you can answer your own
question.
On September 24, 2023 11:10:53 AM PDT, Jan Gorecki wrote:
>Hi Jeff,
>
>Yes I did. My question is about R_orderVector1 which is part
Have you read the output of
order
entered at the R console?
On September 24, 2023 1:38:41 AM PDT, Jan Gorecki wrote:
>Dear pkg developers,
>
>Are there any ways to check which sorting algorithm is being used when
>calling `order` function? Documentation at
I thought roxygen supported documenting NULL constants for data.
I do think roxygen ought to be able to co-exist with Rd files... but the claim
that documenting data requires Rd files smells fishy to me.
On September 21, 2023 1:30:11 PM PDT, Michael L Friendly
wrote:
>I am an RStudio user,
None of us here are lawyers, but a simple google search should take you to
discussions such as [1]. There is a long history of debates about the upsides
and downsides of restricting how people can use your source code.
My short take is that a GPL license prevents anyone from stuffing your code
Yes.
Demo/test files need to use the library function to attach the package like any
other user.
On September 13, 2023 5:24:52 PM PDT, "Richard M. Heiberger"
wrote:
>I have a demo file that uses a function defined in the package.
>when I force the demo to be run with
>R CMD check
20 matches
Mail list logo
