Re: [R-pkg-devel] Note: significantly better compression could be obtained ...

2021-03-04 Thread Rolf Turner
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:09:51 +0100 Sebastian Meyer wrote: > Am 04.03.21 um 10:24 schrieb Rolf Turner: > > But this still leaves the question: Why the is > > R CMD check telling me to use the flag --resave-data, when I *just > > did that*??? > > Yes, indeed! I've investigated further and

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Note: significantly better compression could be obtained ...

2021-03-04 Thread Sebastian Meyer
Am 04.03.21 um 10:24 schrieb Rolf Turner: > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 08:44:31 +0100 > Sebastian Meyer wrote: > >> Am 04.03.21 um 01:41 schrieb Rolf Turner: >>> >>> ... by using R CMD build --resave-data >>> >>> But I *did* use that flag with my build command!!! And yet "R CMD >>> check" seems to

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Note: significantly better compression could be obtained ...

2021-03-04 Thread Rolf Turner
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 08:44:31 +0100 Sebastian Meyer wrote: > Am 04.03.21 um 01:41 schrieb Rolf Turner: > > > > ... by using R CMD build --resave-data > > > > But I *did* use that flag with my build command!!! And yet "R CMD > > check" seems to think that I didn't! > > Just to be sure: Are

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Note: significantly better compression could be obtained ...

2021-03-03 Thread Sebastian Meyer
Am 04.03.21 um 01:41 schrieb Rolf Turner: > > ... by using R CMD build --resave-data > > But I *did* use that flag with my build command!!! And yet "R CMD > check" seems to think that I didn't! Just to be sure: Are you running R CMD check on that freshly built tarball or is devtools::check()

[R-pkg-devel] Note: significantly better compression could be obtained ...

2021-03-03 Thread Rolf Turner
... by using R CMD build --resave-data But I *did* use that flag with my build command!!! And yet "R CMD check" seems to think that I didn't! I have done "R CMD build --resave-data kanova" (where "kanova" is the name of the package in question), to make sure that I didn't fumble-finger