Re: [R-pkg-devel] Versioning conventions

2018-07-10 Thread David Hugh-Jones
Thanks! Fixed. Sounds like people favour 3.5.1.0 as the style. Seems reasonable. David On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 at 16:00, Hugh Parsonage wrote: > 3.5.1.0 with the 4th number (0) for within-release changes. > > Lovely package by the way -- I was looking for it earlier this year > but thought it

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Versioning conventions

2018-07-10 Thread Hugh Parsonage
3.5.1.0 with the 4th number (0) for within-release changes. Lovely package by the way -- I was looking for it earlier this year but thought it had been lost! The link in the GitHub description appears broken, however. On 10 July 2018 at 23:59, David Hugh-Jones wrote: > Hi all, > > Just updated

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Versioning conventions

2018-07-10 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 7:00 AM David Hugh-Jones wrote: > > Hi all, > > Just updated my rcheology package with data on functions for R 3.5.1 (no > change from R 3.5.0 afaik). See https://github.com/hughjonesd/rcheology. > > I'm wondering how to version this package. It's not on CRAN yet so it

[R-pkg-devel] Versioning conventions

2018-07-10 Thread David Hugh-Jones
Hi all, Just updated my rcheology package with data on functions for R 3.5.1 (no change from R 3.5.0 afaik). See https://github.com/hughjonesd/rcheology. I'm wondering how to version this package. It's not on CRAN yet so it would be good to get things right. Possibilities: * Just copy the R