Re: [R-pkg-devel] Submission after archived version

В Mon, 11 Mar 2024 23:45:13 +0100 Nils Mechtel пишет: > Despite R CMD check not giving any errors or warnings, the package > doesn’t pass the pre-tests: If your question was more about the reasons for the difference between your R CMD check and the pre-tests, most of it is due to --as-cran:

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Submission after archived version

В Mon, 11 Mar 2024 23:45:13 +0100 Nils Mechtel пишет: > Debian: > > Status: 3 NOTEs >> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... [4s/6s] NOTE >> Possibly misspelled words in DESCRIPTION: >>

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Submission after archived version

On 11/03/2024 6:45 p.m., Nils Mechtel wrote: Hi, Our package was archived at the end of last year, and after some major rework we submitted a newer version yesterday. Despite R CMD check not giving any errors or warnings, the package doesn’t pass the pre-tests: package MetAlyzer_1.0.0.tar.gz