On 11/03/2024 2:13 p.m., CRAN.r wrote:
On Monday, March 11th, 2024 at 12:43 PM, Diego Hernangómez Herrero
wrote:
Shouldn’t you include the y argument also inmyscale.default ? Your generic is
defining that argument as well.
I assume (hopefully correctly) that methods don't need to include
On Monday, March 11th, 2024 at 12:43 PM, Diego Hernangómez Herrero
wrote:
> Shouldn’t you include the y argument also inmyscale.default ? Your generic is
> defining that argument as well.
I assume (hopefully correctly) that methods don't need to include all the
arguments of the generic. I
Usually when I write a generic I use … in the definition to allow using
additional arguments in specific methods, see
as_bibentry <- function(x, ...) { UseMethod("as_bibentry")
}
as_bibentry.cff <- function(x, ..., what = c("preferred", "references",
"all")) {
}
but in any case the method
> No, your assumption is backwards. The methods do need to include all
> arguments of the generic. As Writing R Extensions says near the start
> of section 7, "A method must have all the arguments of the generic,
> including … if the generic does."
That's embarrassing. I was worried it was
Unfortunately, due to a temporary bug in R-devel, the check result
changed before you looked at it.
Now foxed and back to the older state where the check.log was sufficient
to see the issue.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 11.03.2024 17:09, Maciej Nasinski wrote:
Hey All,
I want to help fix the
Thanks a lot for your response.
Yes, I see the check print is different and clear now.
KR
Maciej Nasinski
> On 11 Mar 2024, at 20:49, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, due to a temporary bug in R-devel, the check result changed
> before you looked at it.
> Now foxed and back to the older
Vladimir,
Thank you for the example and for sharing the ideas regarding
symbol-relative offsets!
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 09:38:18 -0500 (EST)
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> unw_get_reg(, UNW_REG_IP, );
Is it ever possible for unw_get_reg() to fail (return non-zero) for
UNW_REG_IP? The
On 11.03.2024 19:34, CRAN.r wrote:
No, your assumption is backwards. The methods do need to include all
arguments of the generic. As Writing R Extensions says near the start
of section 7, "A method must have all the arguments of the generic,
including … if the generic does."
That's
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024, Ivan Krylov wrote:
Vladimir,
Thank you for the example and for sharing the ideas regarding
symbol-relative offsets!
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 09:38:18 -0500 (EST)
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
unw_get_reg(, UNW_REG_IP, );
Is it ever possible for unw_get_reg() to
As per 'The DESCRIPTION file'[1]:
As with the ‘Title’ field, double quotes should be used for quotations
(including titles of books and articles), and single quotes for non-English
usage, including names of other packages and external software.
Enclose that words in single quote, it should
Hey All,
I want to help fix the M1mac-related issue. The URL to issue is
https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/M1mac/teal.reporter.out
I am one of the coauthors of the teal reporter package.
The question is how I can access
‘/Users/ripley/R/packages/tests-devel/teal.reporter.Rcheck/00install.out’
yes.
I apologize it took so long to reply.
I uploaded the old version of the package to my repo:
https://github.com/SergejRuff/boot
Von: Ivan Krylov
Gesendet: Freitag, 8. März 2024 08:36:43
An: Ruff, Sergej
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Betreff:
I'm trying to define a new generic, and keep getting an S3 generic/method
consistency when running R CHECK. All of the code seems to be working, and I'm
not getting any note, errors, or other warnings.
This minimal example shows the warning I'm getting. The functions are
myscale <-
Shouldn’t you include the y argument also in
myscale.default ? Your generic is defining that argument as well.
Have a nice day!
El El lun, 11 mar 2024 a las 18:25, CRAN.r escribió:
> I'm trying to define a new generic, and keep getting an S3 generic/method
> consistency when running R
14 matches
Mail list logo
