Re: [R-pkg-devel] new maintainer for CRAN package XML

2024-01-22 Thread Lluís Revilla
Dear Uwe and the CRAN team, Many thanks for maintaining the package for so long (>10 years!). I see the latest changes are in some internal C code related to updating the libxml2 library. In CRAN's experience, is this the highest time consuming task? I have some questions about how the

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

2024-01-22 Thread Tomas Kalibera
On 1/22/24 15:42, Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel wrote: On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:30:46 +0100 Tomas Kalibera wrote: Thanks, ported now to R-patched. Thank you! Is it fine to mention problems like this one in the middle of an e-mail, or should I have left a note in the Bugzilla instead? In

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Cannot see the failure output on Fedora clang/gcc falvor (page not found)

2024-01-22 Thread Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 16:51:39 + Sameh Abdulah wrote: > However, we cannot access the webpage (page not found) to identify > and address the failures on Fedora systems. > > https://cran-archive.r-project.org/web/checks/2024/2024-01-12_check_results_MPCR.html > > How can we see the failures

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Assistance Needed for Resolving Submission Issues with openaistream Package

2024-01-22 Thread Lluís Revilla
Hi Li Gen, This NOTE is part of the new checks on CRAN to comply with its policy. The error message was introduced in c85587 (2023/11/22), when incorporating this suggestion https://bugs.r-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18611. You can see the changes and checks in the browser here:

[R-pkg-devel] new maintainer for CRAN package XML

2024-01-22 Thread Uwe Ligges
Dear package developers, the CRAN team (and Professor Ripley in particular) has been the defacto maintainer of CRAN package 'XML'. Our hope was that maintainers of packages depending on XML will migrate to other packages for reading XML structures. This has not happened and we still see

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

2024-01-22 Thread Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:30:46 +0100 Tomas Kalibera wrote: > Thanks, ported now to R-patched. Thank you! Is it fine to mention problems like this one in the middle of an e-mail, or should I have left a note in the Bugzilla instead? -- Best regards, Ivan

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Assistance Needed for Resolving Submission Issues with openaistream Package

2024-01-22 Thread Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel
Hello Li Gen and welcome to R-package-devel! В Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:50:33 +0800 пишет: > The specific areas of concern are:License Information: There's a note > indicating that the license stub is an "invalid DCF". I've used 'MIT > + file LICENSE' as the licensing terms. I would appreciate

[R-pkg-devel] Assistance Needed for Resolving Submission Issues with openaistream Package

2024-01-22 Thread libingfei
Hi,I am writing to seek guidance regarding some challenges I've encountered while submitting my package, openaistream, to CRAN. I have recently received feedback from the CRAN team, and I'm looking for assistance to address the issues noted.The package in question aims to provide streaming

Re: [R-pkg-devel] New Package Removal because Shared Library Too Large from Debugging Symbols

2024-01-22 Thread Tomas Kalibera
On 1/21/24 09:44, Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel wrote: В Sat, 20 Jan 2024 20:28:00 -0500 Johann Gaebler пишет: most likely there’s some error on my part in how I’ve set up cpp11, but it also seems possible that cpp11 should have detected that that header needs to be included and added it