Does this solve the problem?
if (getRversion() >= '2.15.1')
globalVariables(c('envroot'))
I keep this in file R/globals.R
I learned of this from John Fox's use in Rcmdr.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 8:28 PM, J C Nash wrote:
> In order to track progress of a variety of rootfinding or optimization
Sounds like a missing "}".
Which could mean the brace is inside quotes or following a "%"
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 09:17 michael tsagris via R-package-devel <
r-package-devel@r-project.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: michael tsagris
> To:
se to try.
Rich
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 4:58 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 08/12/2019 3:14 p.m., Richard M. Heiberger wrote:
> > I am seeing this in
> >> version
> > _
> > platform x86_64-w64-mingw32
> > arch x86_64
> >
I am seeing this in
> version
_
platform x86_64-w64-mingw32
arch x86_64
os mingw32
system x86_64, mingw32
status Under development (unstable)
major 4
minor 0.0
year 2019
month 12
day05
svn
indows in R-devel when running --as-cran. It
> doesn't happen in R-devel on MacOS with or without --as-cran, and I
> don't think it happens on Windows without --as-cran (but it might just
> be that there are no symptoms of testing the wrong version in that case).
>
> A workaround is to exp
Please be consistent with the latex() function in the Hmisc package. For
example, for an array x, latex (x) produces a complete latex table
environment. See the ?latex helpfile for details.
Rich
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:07 wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I'm working on a function in a package that
or a table:
>
>
>
> \begin{table}[!tbp]
>
> \begin{center}
>
> \begin{tabular}{l}
>
> \hline\hline
>
> \multicolumn{1}{c}{}\tabularnewline
>
> \hline
>
> ~\tabularnewline
>
> a\tabularnewline
>
> b\tabularnewline
>
> \hline
>
> \end{tabu
I would guess that your NAMESPACE file doesn't export dnormfun.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 1:38 PM Weimin Zhang wrote:
>
> Thank you Max.
>
> The reason I used the super assignment "<<-" is because the "dnormfun"
> function later called by function kronecker(X, Y, FUN = "*",...) through
> FUN="
Is it perhaps an https:// address? You browser will make the
adjustment. CRAN will give this message.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:08 PM jared_wood wrote:
>
> I write an URL of MalaCards (a database) in my description, because I need
> the data in this database. However, there is an error here
> One more question. If I use mjeqn at the beginning of a paragraph it
> automatically sets a line break afterwards.
> Any idea what I can do to prevent this?
follow it with
\vspace*{1ex}
to back up one line.
Rich
> On Jun 25, 2021, at 07:51, Marc Scherstjanoi
> wrote:
>
> Hi Wolfgang,
I am responding to a subset of what you asked. There are packages which use
multiple formulas
in their argument sequence.
What you have as a single formula with | as a separator
q | p | subject | time | rho ~ p + x + y | p + w + y | z + y
I think would be better as a comma-separated list of
I have a demo file that uses a function defined in the package.
when I force the demo to be run with
R CMD check --test-dir=demo findme_1.0.tar.gz
then the function defined in the package is not recognized.
Here is the demo/findme.r file:
findme::findme()
findme()
Here is the result of:
R CMD
Why are these functins in two different packages?
On the surface it looks like qrcode is a transformation function and opencv is
its inverse.
> On Nov 7, 2023, at 14:55, Thierry Onkelinx wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> The qrcode package converts text into a qrcode image. The opencv package is
> able
There is a new NOTE. This line with \& used to be acceptable.
I am not seeing what the suggested replacement is.
* checking Rd files ... [4s] NOTE
checkRd: (-1) bivariateNormal.Rd:42: Escaped LaTeX specials: \&
The full example is
\note{
Based on the \code{galaxy} example on pages 204--205 in
quot;) ?
> On Mar 6, 2024, at 11:57, Joshua Ulrich wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 1:03 AM Richard M. Heiberger wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Duncan, Jeff, Ivan.
>>
>> I did all that Duncan and Jeff suggested, plus a bit more that appeared to
>> be necessary.
&g
My package is being rejected by auto-check
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64
Check: for missing documentation entries, Result: WARNING
Undocumented code objects:
'.__global__'
All user-level objects in a package should have documentation entries.
See chapter
this looks like a relative of the issue I tripped on that is discussed in the
email threads
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2024q1/010531.html
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2024-March/083259.html
At issue is the default export of
exportPattern(".")
System generated
are explicitly included.
What should I try next?
> On Mar 5, 2024, at 18:21, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 05/03/2024 5:41 p.m., Richard M. Heiberger wrote:
>> My package is being rejected by auto-check
>> Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_6
in the NEWS file, perhaps augmented with Ivan's
comments,
might be added to utils/man/globalVariables.Rd and to the
"
section ‘Package
structure’ in the ‘Writing R Extensions’ manual.
"
> On Mar 6, 2024, at 01:38, Ivan Krylov wrote:
>
> В Tue, 5 Mar 2024 22:41:32 +
> "R
ersion")
HTML Tidy for Apple macOS version 5.8.0
> On May 19, 2024, at 01:30, Ivan Krylov wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 May 2024 21:10:18 +
> "Richard M. Heiberger" wrote:
>
>> when checking a package and discovering these messages about html5,
>> can you
this is a suggestion to CRAN.
when checking a package and discovering these messages about html5, can you
generate an informational message about tidy with a link to updating tidy?
thank you
Rich
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 17, 2024, at 15:32, Marc Girondot via R-package-devel
> wrote:
>
>
n't think that will ever happen. It only happens when a user tries an
> "--as-cran" check, but doesn't have a current version of tidy installed.
> CRAN does have the up-to-date versions installed, so they won't see this.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
>> On 2024-05-
22 matches
Mail list logo